<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Alexander and Mecej4 in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Pardiso-w-Quasi-Newton-method/m-p/1160951#M27907</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Alexander and Mecej4&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;You both are crazy smart, and both spot on. I only know enough to stir up trouble which is why I posted this. PARDISO is, without a doubt, needed to solve A*x = b where A is sparse, hands down no question. I am wanting to eventually update my solver to use a "quasi" Newton's method and was curious if anyone had an implementation posted on these forums or somewhere out there on the webs that utilized PARDISO in this type of iterative algorithm.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Mecej4 thanks for the links those are great resources!&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;J&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:54:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>J_1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-08-10T13:54:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Pardiso w/ Quasi Newton method?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Pardiso-w-Quasi-Newton-method/m-p/1160948#M27904</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have read through the page describing using PARDISO to solve a nonlinear set of equations after they have been linearized, but I noticed the algorithm is just Newton's method applied with the PARDISO solving routing.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;For faster and more reliable convergence, has anyone created a Quasi Newton solving algorithm using the PARDISO routine during the external iterations?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;J&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 18:41:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Pardiso-w-Quasi-Newton-method/m-p/1160948#M27904</guid>
      <dc:creator>J_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-03T18:41:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Pardiso-w-Quasi-Newton-method/m-p/1160949#M27905</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I can be wrong, feel free to correct me, but Quasi Newton algorithm construct dense matrix, so it is not a point for Pardiso solver, is not it?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Alex&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 14:13:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Pardiso-w-Quasi-Newton-method/m-p/1160949#M27905</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alexander_K_Intel2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-09T14:13:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If the nonlinear equations</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Pardiso-w-Quasi-Newton-method/m-p/1160950#M27906</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If the nonlinear equations being solved arise from discretization of nonlinear partial differential equations, application of a quasi-Newton method such as Broyden's scheme would result in a situation where a sparse solver such as Pardiso becomes worthy of consideration. See, for example,&amp;nbsp;http://www.ams.org/journals/mcom/1970-24-109/S0025-5718-1970-0258276-9/ .&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Many of the sparse matrices in the NIST Matrix Market collection (http://math.nist.gov/MatrixMarket/index.html) arose from FEA models of stress analysis, flow networks, etc.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 23:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Pardiso-w-Quasi-Newton-method/m-p/1160950#M27906</guid>
      <dc:creator>mecej4</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-09T23:43:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Alexander and Mecej4</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Pardiso-w-Quasi-Newton-method/m-p/1160951#M27907</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Alexander and Mecej4&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;You both are crazy smart, and both spot on. I only know enough to stir up trouble which is why I posted this. PARDISO is, without a doubt, needed to solve A*x = b where A is sparse, hands down no question. I am wanting to eventually update my solver to use a "quasi" Newton's method and was curious if anyone had an implementation posted on these forums or somewhere out there on the webs that utilized PARDISO in this type of iterative algorithm.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Mecej4 thanks for the links those are great resources!&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;J&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:54:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Pardiso-w-Quasi-Newton-method/m-p/1160951#M27907</guid>
      <dc:creator>J_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-10T13:54:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

