<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic How to avoid redundant factorizations in Pardiso for a transient analysis in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/How-to-avoid-redundant-factorizations-in-Pardiso-for-a-transient/m-p/1165609#M28214</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;For a transient problem, &lt;A&gt;{x}&lt;SUB&gt;t&lt;/SUB&gt;={b}&lt;SUB&gt;t&lt;/SUB&gt;&amp;nbsp;,the RHS &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.008px;"&gt;{b}&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SUB&gt;t&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SUB&gt;is time-varying and depends on the previous&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.008px;"&gt;{b}&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SUB&gt;t-dt&lt;/SUB&gt;, but &lt;/A&gt;&lt;A&gt; is constant. So during a complete analysis, we need to do&amp;nbsp;factorization only once, and use this&amp;nbsp;factorization to solve&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;successive RHS.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;In this situation, multi-rhs is not suitable, and I tried to call the complete Pardiso (phase=11, 22, 33 and not execute phase=-1) at the 1st time step, then only executed phase=33 at later time steps. This way did not work however.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;Do you have any suggestion?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;I know there is a similar question, but the answers below don't seem to work either.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-math-kernel-library/topic/297075#" target="_blank"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-math-kernel-library/topic/297075#&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;Thx!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 12:15:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Xudong_L_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-30T12:15:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How to avoid redundant factorizations in Pardiso for a transient analysis</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/How-to-avoid-redundant-factorizations-in-Pardiso-for-a-transient/m-p/1165609#M28214</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;For a transient problem, &lt;A&gt;{x}&lt;SUB&gt;t&lt;/SUB&gt;={b}&lt;SUB&gt;t&lt;/SUB&gt;&amp;nbsp;,the RHS &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.008px;"&gt;{b}&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SUB&gt;t&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SUB&gt;is time-varying and depends on the previous&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.008px;"&gt;{b}&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SUB&gt;t-dt&lt;/SUB&gt;, but &lt;/A&gt;&lt;A&gt; is constant. So during a complete analysis, we need to do&amp;nbsp;factorization only once, and use this&amp;nbsp;factorization to solve&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;successive RHS.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;In this situation, multi-rhs is not suitable, and I tried to call the complete Pardiso (phase=11, 22, 33 and not execute phase=-1) at the 1st time step, then only executed phase=33 at later time steps. This way did not work however.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;Do you have any suggestion?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;I know there is a similar question, but the answers below don't seem to work either.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-math-kernel-library/topic/297075#" target="_blank"&gt;https://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-math-kernel-library/topic/297075#&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;Thx!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 12:15:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/How-to-avoid-redundant-factorizations-in-Pardiso-for-a-transient/m-p/1165609#M28214</guid>
      <dc:creator>Xudong_L_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-30T12:15:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/How-to-avoid-redundant-factorizations-in-Pardiso-for-a-transient/m-p/1165610#M28215</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;As i understand, the Pardiso phase are designed for the cases , call phase 12 one&amp;nbsp;time , then&amp;nbsp;call phase =33 with different RHS in loop.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Do you have test case to&amp;nbsp;show the problem?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Ying &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 08:22:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/How-to-avoid-redundant-factorizations-in-Pardiso-for-a-transient/m-p/1165610#M28215</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ying_H_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-02T08:22:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

