<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic C vs Fortran documentation in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/C-vs-Fortran-documentation/m-p/1218180#M30160</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Using MKL in C 2020 update 2&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In looking for C documentation for the ?ggevx family of eigenvalue routines, I found that my headers didn't match the documentation. I finally figured out that my headers are C headers for the Fortran routines; if I look at the MKL C documentation, I find LAPACKE_?ggevx() with quite different calling signature.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A quick scan of the C documentation didn't give me an overview of this LAPACKE set of functions. Where would I find it? Is this the preferred way to call from C/C++?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks. I feel like I'm going to be embarrassed when I get the answer, but I'm too old to care &lt;LI-EMOJI id="lia_slightly-smiling-face" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;&lt;/LI-EMOJI&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 23:57:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Weeks__John</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-10-15T23:57:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>C vs Fortran documentation</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/C-vs-Fortran-documentation/m-p/1218180#M30160</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Using MKL in C 2020 update 2&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In looking for C documentation for the ?ggevx family of eigenvalue routines, I found that my headers didn't match the documentation. I finally figured out that my headers are C headers for the Fortran routines; if I look at the MKL C documentation, I find LAPACKE_?ggevx() with quite different calling signature.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A quick scan of the C documentation didn't give me an overview of this LAPACKE set of functions. Where would I find it? Is this the preferred way to call from C/C++?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks. I feel like I'm going to be embarrassed when I get the answer, but I'm too old to care &lt;LI-EMOJI id="lia_slightly-smiling-face" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;&lt;/LI-EMOJI&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 23:57:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/C-vs-Fortran-documentation/m-p/1218180#M30160</guid>
      <dc:creator>Weeks__John</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-15T23:57:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: C vs Fortran documentation</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/C-vs-Fortran-documentation/m-p/1218367#M30161</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There are three ways to call MKL Lapack routines from C:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&amp;nbsp;Call the Fortran callable routine, keeping in mind that your C call should pass arguments in the same way as Fortran does;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;The LapackE C interface with work arrays allocated, used and de-allocated inside MKL, and&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;The LapackE C interface with work array related arguments in the argument list.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For details, see the &lt;A href="https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/documentation/mkl-developer-reference-c/top/lapack-routines/c-interface-conventions-for-lapack-routines.html" target="_self"&gt;MKL documentation&lt;/A&gt; .&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:57:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/C-vs-Fortran-documentation/m-p/1218367#M30161</guid>
      <dc:creator>mecej4</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-16T11:57:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re:C vs Fortran documentation</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/C-vs-Fortran-documentation/m-p/1218424#M30163</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;and you may find out many of such examples into mklroot\examples directory&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2020 15:52:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/C-vs-Fortran-documentation/m-p/1218424#M30163</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gennady_F_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-16T15:52:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: C vs Fortran documentation</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/C-vs-Fortran-documentation/m-p/1223886#M30256</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you to you both, and apologies for the late reply.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:18:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/C-vs-Fortran-documentation/m-p/1223886#M30256</guid>
      <dc:creator>Weeks__John</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-29T17:18:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

