<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re:?potrf and ?potrs: memory requirement for a coefficient matrix in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/potrf-and-potrs-memory-requirement-for-a-coefficient-matrix/m-p/1428408#M33836</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Yonghyun,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Glad to know that your issue is resolved and thanks for the confirmation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please post a new question if you need any additional assistance from Intel as this thread will no longer be monitored.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vidya.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2022 09:35:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>VidyalathaB_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-11-08T09:35:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>?potrf and ?potrs: memory requirement for a coefficient matrix</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/potrf-and-potrs-memory-requirement-for-a-coefficient-matrix/m-p/1427620#M33823</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Forums,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If the coefficient matrix A is a large dense but symmetric matrix, how can I handle memory efficiently when solving Ax=b?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have used dpotrf and dpotrs for an n-by-n double precision real-valued matrix A, but I am wondering whether I should allocate n-by-n array all the time for A. This matrix is symmetric, which means only the upper (or lower) triangular part is necessary, n*(n+1)/2 entries. Does A's memory requirement have to be 8bytes*n*n or can it be lowered? Is there a way or should we reserve n-by-n array for possible fill-ins during factorization?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any comments would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yonghyun&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 06:55:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/potrf-and-potrs-memory-requirement-for-a-coefficient-matrix/m-p/1427620#M33823</guid>
      <dc:creator>Frolo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-04T06:55:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ?potrf and ?potrs: memory requirement for a coefficient matrix</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/potrf-and-potrs-memory-requirement-for-a-coefficient-matrix/m-p/1428105#M33828</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Yonghyun!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For dpotrf and dpotrs the only usage is allocation of n x n memory.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Try to use routines dpptrf and dpptrs in special packed format. Dimension of input arrays n * (n - 1) / 2. But performance can be different, than dpotrf and dpotrs have.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Dmitry&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 10:32:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/potrf-and-potrs-memory-requirement-for-a-coefficient-matrix/m-p/1428105#M33828</guid>
      <dc:creator>kdv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-07T10:32:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ?potrf and ?potrs: memory requirement for a coefficient matrix</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/potrf-and-potrs-memory-requirement-for-a-coefficient-matrix/m-p/1428265#M33830</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Your answer is what I am looking for. I will try those routines right now.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If possible, can you tell me more about how the performance might be differ? As soon as possible, I would like to know.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yonghyun&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 23:37:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/potrf-and-potrs-memory-requirement-for-a-coefficient-matrix/m-p/1428265#M33830</guid>
      <dc:creator>Frolo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-07T23:37:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ?potrf and ?potrs: memory requirement for a coefficient matrix</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/potrf-and-potrs-memory-requirement-for-a-coefficient-matrix/m-p/1428339#M33833</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Performance of packed routines could be lower, than dpotrf and dpotrs have since another type of data structure is used. But I don't know actual value since I am not a developer of MKL. Maybe its performance is good enough for you. The fastest way to know it is just to implement a performance test and compare results.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Dmitry&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2022 04:10:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/potrf-and-potrs-memory-requirement-for-a-coefficient-matrix/m-p/1428339#M33833</guid>
      <dc:creator>kdv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-08T04:10:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ?potrf and ?potrs: memory requirement for a coefficient matrix</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/potrf-and-potrs-memory-requirement-for-a-coefficient-matrix/m-p/1428344#M33834</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Dmitry!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your kind reply. Your explanation helped my understanding a lot.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yonghyun&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2022 04:50:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/potrf-and-potrs-memory-requirement-for-a-coefficient-matrix/m-p/1428344#M33834</guid>
      <dc:creator>Frolo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-08T04:50:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re:?potrf and ?potrs: memory requirement for a coefficient matrix</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/potrf-and-potrs-memory-requirement-for-a-coefficient-matrix/m-p/1428408#M33836</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Yonghyun,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Glad to know that your issue is resolved and thanks for the confirmation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please post a new question if you need any additional assistance from Intel as this thread will no longer be monitored.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vidya.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2022 09:35:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/potrf-and-potrs-memory-requirement-for-a-coefficient-matrix/m-p/1428408#M33836</guid>
      <dc:creator>VidyalathaB_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-08T09:35:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

