<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Memory leak in DSS of the newest MKL in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Memory-leak-in-DSS-of-the-newest-MKL/m-p/1728363#M37473</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suspect that a memory leak happens in the subroutine DSS. I am using the latest version of MKL.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In order to verify this, I have also tested the source code 'dss_sym_f90.f90', which was included as an example in the MKL. I found that the subroutine DSS_DELETE does not deallocate all the relevant memory.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have tried the measure suggested on the following webpage, but it did not work.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://portal.nacad.ufrj.br/online/intel/mkl/common/mkl_userguide/GUID-04264D39-DF2B-49C7-9EE6-E54E17CCE023.htm" target="_blank"&gt;https://portal.nacad.ufrj.br/online/intel/mkl/common/mkl_userguide/GUID-04264D39-DF2B-49C7-9EE6-E54E17CCE023.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please find the enclosed source code, which I have used to view the memory usage.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 19:00:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mchoi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-11-29T19:00:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Memory leak in DSS of the newest MKL</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Memory-leak-in-DSS-of-the-newest-MKL/m-p/1728363#M37473</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suspect that a memory leak happens in the subroutine DSS. I am using the latest version of MKL.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In order to verify this, I have also tested the source code 'dss_sym_f90.f90', which was included as an example in the MKL. I found that the subroutine DSS_DELETE does not deallocate all the relevant memory.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have tried the measure suggested on the following webpage, but it did not work.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://portal.nacad.ufrj.br/online/intel/mkl/common/mkl_userguide/GUID-04264D39-DF2B-49C7-9EE6-E54E17CCE023.htm" target="_blank"&gt;https://portal.nacad.ufrj.br/online/intel/mkl/common/mkl_userguide/GUID-04264D39-DF2B-49C7-9EE6-E54E17CCE023.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please find the enclosed source code, which I have used to view the memory usage.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 19:00:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Memory-leak-in-DSS-of-the-newest-MKL/m-p/1728363#M37473</guid>
      <dc:creator>mchoi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-29T19:00:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

