topic PARDISO OOC temp files .sin and .sle are not deleted in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library

PARDISO OOC temp files .sin and .sle are not deleted

xian-zhong_guous_cd- — Fri, 07 Oct 2011 19:12:11 GMT

I notice PARDISO OOC temp files .sin and .sle are not deleted. I use default MKL_PARDISO_OOC_KEEP_FILE which is 1 and other files are indeed deleted excpet those two. How to delete those two?

PARDISO OOC temp files .sin and .sle are not deleted

Alexander_K_Intel2 — Fri, 07 Oct 2011 19:13:27 GMT

Hi,

Which version of MKL do you use?

With best regards,

Alexander Kalinkin

PARDISO OOC temp files .sin and .sle are not deleted

xian-zhong_guous_cd- — Fri, 07 Oct 2011 19:28:52 GMT

The local (internal) PARDISO version is 103000115.

PARDISO OOC temp files .sin and .sle are not deleted

Gennady_F_Intel — Fri, 07 Oct 2011 19:41:36 GMT

please check with the latest 10.3 update 5 or 6 version of MKL. We have fixed such problem there.

here is the link to the 10.3 bug fix list

PARDISO OOC temp files .sin and .sle are not deleted

xian-zhong_guous_cd- — Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:07:34 GMT

I tried 10.3 update 6 but got a Divid by zero error:
Error
A floating point exception has occured: floating point exception[Divid by zero] ...

I also notice the PARDISO log file shows the same local (internal) PARDISO version

The local (internal) PARDISO version is : 103000115

PARDISO OOC temp files .sin and .sle are not deleted

Alexander_K_Intel2 — Thu, 20 Oct 2011 01:35:49 GMT

Hi,

Are you checked correctness of initial matrix by matrix checker? If yes, could you attached your matrix here to reproduce your problem on our side?
With best regards,

Alexander Kalinkin

PARDISO OOC temp files .sin and .sle are not deleted

xian-zhong_guous_cd- — Thu, 27 Oct 2011 00:21:37 GMT

I've attached the matrix (in triplet 1-based format, with first line = order of matrix and the second line = nonber of nonzeros) and PARDISO log file.

I can solve this matrix using 10.3.1 without any problem.

PARDISO OOC temp files .sin and .sle are not deleted

Gennady_F_Intel — Thu, 27 Oct 2011 05:41:26 GMT

Did You use the default settings of iparm array or any specific settings were used?