<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Pardiso multi-core not effective with 411 RHS vectors in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Pardiso-multi-core-not-effective-with-411-RHS-vectors/m-p/854033#M6783</link>
    <description>What is the size of the input problem?</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 19:26:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Gennady_F_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-04-04T19:26:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Pardiso multi-core not effective with 411 RHS vectors</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Pardiso-multi-core-not-effective-with-411-RHS-vectors/m-p/854032#M6782</link>
      <description>We noticed that many of our test cases do not show performance improvement from 1-core, 2-core, 3-core, to 4-core computers. One case with 411 RHS vectors actually ran a bit slower in 4-core than 1-core. For this case, 95% of CPU is on Pardiso back-substitution. In the 4-core run in a 4-core computer, the Task Manager did show 100% CPU. When running the same case with just 1-core in the same computer, it is also confirmed that Task Manager showed 25% CPU. Do we miss anything?</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 01:38:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Pardiso-multi-core-not-effective-with-411-RHS-vectors/m-p/854032#M6782</guid>
      <dc:creator>aykuo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-04T01:38:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pardiso multi-core not effective with 411 RHS vectors</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Pardiso-multi-core-not-effective-with-411-RHS-vectors/m-p/854033#M6783</link>
      <description>What is the size of the input problem?</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 19:26:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Pardiso-multi-core-not-effective-with-411-RHS-vectors/m-p/854033#M6783</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gennady_F_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-04T19:26:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pardiso multi-core not effective with 411 RHS vectors</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Pardiso-multi-core-not-effective-with-411-RHS-vectors/m-p/854034#M6784</link>
      <description>The problem is known about andthey are working on it. See the following,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/showthread.php?t=73240&amp;amp;o=d&amp;amp;s=lr"&gt;http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/showthread.php?t=73240&amp;amp;o=d&amp;amp;s=lr&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 07:23:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Pardiso-multi-core-not-effective-with-411-RHS-vectors/m-p/854034#M6784</guid>
      <dc:creator>h88433</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-05T07:23:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

