<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Which decomposition does dss_factor_real() compute? in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Which-decomposition-does-dss-factor-real-compute/m-p/854538#M6846</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="quote_reply" style="margin-top: 5px; width: 100%;"&gt;
&lt;DIV style="margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;Quoting - &lt;A href="https://community.intel.com/en-us/profile/436876"&gt;agnonchik&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="background-color:#E5E5E5; padding:5px;border: 1px; border-style: inset;margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Seems that the dss_factor() function decomposes a symmetric positive-definite matrix A either as L*L^T or as U*U^T.&lt;BR /&gt;My observation is that both representations are possible.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Fro example, if A=[14, 2, -2; 2, 4, 0; -2, 0, 1], it computes U*U^T with U=[3, 1, -2; 0, 2, 0; 0, 0, 1].&lt;BR /&gt;On the contrary, if A=[5, -2, -6; -2, 5, 3; -6, 3, 9], it computes L*L^T.&lt;BR /&gt;The type of decomposition is important when only forward or only backward substitution is performed by a subsequent dss_soleve_real() call with either MKL_DSS_FORWARD_SOLVE or MKL_DSS_BACKWARD_SOLVE option.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there any control to fix this vulnerability and always compute L*L^T?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;Hi&lt;BR /&gt;Pardiso do L*L^T only but for reodered matrix A. Of course result of such decomposition of matrix A without reodering is not the same of L*L^Tdecompositionreodered matrix A. If you want to have L*L^T decompositionof matrix A the best way to choose your own type of reodering in dss_reorder by choosing parameter opt= MKL_DSS_MY_ORDER with vector perm=(1,2,3,....)&lt;BR /&gt;with best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Alexander Kalinkin</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 06:08:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alexander_K_Intel2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-10-06T06:08:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Which decomposition does dss_factor_real() compute?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Which-decomposition-does-dss-factor-real-compute/m-p/854537#M6845</link>
      <description>Seems that the dss_factor() function decomposes a symmetric positive-definite matrix A either as L*L^T or as U*U^T.&lt;BR /&gt;My observation is that both representations are possible.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Fro example, if A=[14, 2, -2; 2, 4, 0; -2, 0, 1], it computes U*U^T with U=[3, 1, -2; 0, 2, 0; 0, 0, 1].&lt;BR /&gt;On the contrary, if A=[5, -2, -6; -2, 5, 3; -6, 3, 9], it computes L*L^T.&lt;BR /&gt;The type of decomposition is important when only forward or only backward substitution is performed by a subsequent dss_soleve_real() call with either MKL_DSS_FORWARD_SOLVE or MKL_DSS_BACKWARD_SOLVE option.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there any control to fix this vulnerability and always compute L*L^T?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:50:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Which-decomposition-does-dss-factor-real-compute/m-p/854537#M6845</guid>
      <dc:creator>agnonchik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-05T16:50:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which decomposition does dss_factor_real() compute?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Which-decomposition-does-dss-factor-real-compute/m-p/854538#M6846</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="quote_reply" style="margin-top: 5px; width: 100%;"&gt;
&lt;DIV style="margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;Quoting - &lt;A href="https://community.intel.com/en-us/profile/436876"&gt;agnonchik&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="background-color:#E5E5E5; padding:5px;border: 1px; border-style: inset;margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Seems that the dss_factor() function decomposes a symmetric positive-definite matrix A either as L*L^T or as U*U^T.&lt;BR /&gt;My observation is that both representations are possible.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Fro example, if A=[14, 2, -2; 2, 4, 0; -2, 0, 1], it computes U*U^T with U=[3, 1, -2; 0, 2, 0; 0, 0, 1].&lt;BR /&gt;On the contrary, if A=[5, -2, -6; -2, 5, 3; -6, 3, 9], it computes L*L^T.&lt;BR /&gt;The type of decomposition is important when only forward or only backward substitution is performed by a subsequent dss_soleve_real() call with either MKL_DSS_FORWARD_SOLVE or MKL_DSS_BACKWARD_SOLVE option.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there any control to fix this vulnerability and always compute L*L^T?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;Hi&lt;BR /&gt;Pardiso do L*L^T only but for reodered matrix A. Of course result of such decomposition of matrix A without reodering is not the same of L*L^Tdecompositionreodered matrix A. If you want to have L*L^T decompositionof matrix A the best way to choose your own type of reodering in dss_reorder by choosing parameter opt= MKL_DSS_MY_ORDER with vector perm=(1,2,3,....)&lt;BR /&gt;with best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Alexander Kalinkin</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 06:08:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Which-decomposition-does-dss-factor-real-compute/m-p/854538#M6846</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alexander_K_Intel2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-06T06:08:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which decomposition does dss_factor_real() compute?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Which-decomposition-does-dss-factor-real-compute/m-p/854539#M6847</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="quote_reply" style="width: 100%; margin-top: 5px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV style="margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;Quoting - &lt;A href="https://community.intel.com/en-us/profile/421788"&gt;Alexander Kalinkin (Intel)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="background-color:#E5E5E5; padding:5px;border: 1px; border-style: inset;margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;
&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;Hi&lt;BR /&gt;Pardiso do L*L^T only but for reodered matrix A. Of course result of such decomposition of matrix A without reodering is not the same of L*L^Tdecompositionreodered matrix A. If you want to have L*L^T decompositionof matrix A the best way to choose your own type of reodering in dss_reorder by choosing parameter opt= MKL_DSS_MY_ORDER with vector perm=(1,2,3,....)&lt;BR /&gt;with best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Alexander Kalinkin&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Agnonchik.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:23:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Which-decomposition-does-dss-factor-real-compute/m-p/854539#M6847</guid>
      <dc:creator>agnonchik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-06T07:23:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

