https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Custom-DLLs-and-VC-Run-Time-Libraries-Question/m-p/857811#M7191 You can use VC static run-time library libcmt.lib instead of the default dynamic run-time libray msvcrt.lib in Makefile. <BR /> Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:04:06 GMT sspine 2008-07-31T03:04:06Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Custom-DLLs-and-VC-Run-Time-Libraries-Question/m-p/857810#M7190 <FONT size="2" face="Verdana">When I make a custom dll using NMake, and have a snoop inside using Dependency Walker, the libraries are bound to MSVCRxx.DLL.<BR /><BR />The version appears to depend on the version of Visual Studio currently installed. E.g. the dlls that are in ia32/bin use MSVCR71.DLL and a custom dll that I create references MSVCR90.DLL (vs2008).<BR /><BR />Is there a way for me to create custom dlls that statically link to the VC++ run-time libraries, or cleaner solution?<BR /><BR />The reason that this is annoying is that it adds to the complexity of deployment scenarios :(<BR /><BR />Any tips/thoughts??<BR /><BR />Or have I lost the plot? :)</FONT> Sat, 12 Jul 2008 14:25:15 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Custom-DLLs-and-VC-Run-Time-Libraries-Question/m-p/857810#M7190 Deleted_U_Intel 2008-07-12T14:25:15Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Custom-DLLs-and-VC-Run-Time-Libraries-Question/m-p/857811#M7191 You can use VC static run-time library libcmt.lib instead of the default dynamic run-time libray msvcrt.lib in Makefile. <BR /> Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:04:06 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Custom-DLLs-and-VC-Run-Time-Libraries-Question/m-p/857811#M7191 sspine 2008-07-31T03:04:06Z