<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Are type sizes consistent cross platform ?? in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Are-type-sizes-consistent-cross-platform/m-p/873043#M8658</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="quote_reply" style="margin-top: 5px; width: 100%;"&gt;
&lt;DIV style="margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;Quoting - &lt;A href="https://community.intel.com/en-us/profile/406441"&gt;newton_particle&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="background-color:#E5E5E5; padding:5px;border: 1px; border-style: inset;margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm just wondering,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Are the MKL base types: single, double, complex single, complex double, always the same physical bit sizes across supported platforms?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I.e. is a Single always a 4-byte floating point value, and a Double 'always' an 8-byte value on: 32-bit, 64-bit, Itanium ... for AMD and Intel processors?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Newton&lt;BR /&gt;------&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes, this should be the case for floating-point types.Note that we do provide specialSP2DP interfaceson Linux side to support old Cray style calls (i.e. where SGEMM and other S**** subroutines took double precision inputs). -Shane&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:25:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Shane_S_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-01-05T22:25:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Are type sizes consistent cross platform ??</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Are-type-sizes-consistent-cross-platform/m-p/873042#M8657</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm just wondering,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Are the MKL base types: single, double, complex single, complex double, always the same physical bit sizes across supported platforms?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I.e. is a Single always a 4-byte floating point value, and a Double 'always' an 8-byte value on: 32-bit, 64-bit, Itanium ... for AMD and Intel processors?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Newton&lt;BR /&gt;------&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:08:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Are-type-sizes-consistent-cross-platform/m-p/873042#M8657</guid>
      <dc:creator>newton_particle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-05T22:08:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are type sizes consistent cross platform ??</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Are-type-sizes-consistent-cross-platform/m-p/873043#M8658</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="quote_reply" style="margin-top: 5px; width: 100%;"&gt;
&lt;DIV style="margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;Quoting - &lt;A href="https://community.intel.com/en-us/profile/406441"&gt;newton_particle&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="background-color:#E5E5E5; padding:5px;border: 1px; border-style: inset;margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm just wondering,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Are the MKL base types: single, double, complex single, complex double, always the same physical bit sizes across supported platforms?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I.e. is a Single always a 4-byte floating point value, and a Double 'always' an 8-byte value on: 32-bit, 64-bit, Itanium ... for AMD and Intel processors?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Newton&lt;BR /&gt;------&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes, this should be the case for floating-point types.Note that we do provide specialSP2DP interfaceson Linux side to support old Cray style calls (i.e. where SGEMM and other S**** subroutines took double precision inputs). -Shane&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:25:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Are-type-sizes-consistent-cross-platform/m-p/873043#M8658</guid>
      <dc:creator>Shane_S_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-05T22:25:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are type sizes consistent cross platform ??</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Are-type-sizes-consistent-cross-platform/m-p/873044#M8659</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="quote_reply" style="width: 100%; margin-top: 5px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV style="margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;Quoting - &lt;A href="https://community.intel.com/en-us/profile/336401"&gt;Shane Story (Intel)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="background-color:#E5E5E5; padding:5px;border: 1px; border-style: inset;margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;
&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes, this should be the case for floating-point types.Note that we do provide specialSP2DP interfaceson Linux side to support old Cray style calls (i.e. where SGEMM and other S**** subroutines took double precision inputs). -Shane&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Great, and thanks :)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:07:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/Are-type-sizes-consistent-cross-platform/m-p/873044#M8659</guid>
      <dc:creator>newton_particle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-05T23:07:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

