https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/mkl-10-Update-3-libimalloc-dll/m-p/875051#M8835 Why is the libimalloc.dll version string listed as "10.1 beta" in the MKL 10 Update 3 release? I haven't installed the 10.1 beta.<BR /> Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:55:59 GMT knowdat 2008-06-11T20:55:59Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/mkl-10-Update-3-libimalloc-dll/m-p/875051#M8835 Why is the libimalloc.dll version string listed as "10.1 beta" in the MKL 10 Update 3 release? I haven't installed the 10.1 beta.<BR /> Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:55:59 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/mkl-10-Update-3-libimalloc-dll/m-p/875051#M8835 knowdat 2008-06-11T20:55:59Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/mkl-10-Update-3-libimalloc-dll/m-p/875052#M8836 <BR />This is also the case for mkl_p4p.dll, and I notice that a vista machine w/ Intel Core2 cpu is having simulation issues that I haven't looked into yet. Does anybody else see these mismatched runtime dlls? <BR /><BR />I installed :<BR />Package ID: w_mkl_p_10.0.3.021<BR />Package Contents: Intel Math Kernel Library 10.0 Update 3<BR /><BR />-Jon<BR /> Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:05:24 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/mkl-10-Update-3-libimalloc-dll/m-p/875052#M8836 knowdat 2008-06-13T16:05:24Z