<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic dgemm_ vs. cblas_dgemm in Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/dgemm-vs-cblas-dgemm/m-p/883909#M9859</link>
    <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm doing some performance benchmarks on Intel's mkl right now and I noticed some unexpected issues. When using dgemm_() function instead of cblas_dgemm() on the same matrix I get around 4 times fewer Gflop/s. It's the same either with the non-parallel and parallel version. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Did someone experience similiar things or could probably point me to a possible failure?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 17:38:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cutio</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-22T17:38:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>dgemm_ vs. cblas_dgemm</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/dgemm-vs-cblas-dgemm/m-p/883909#M9859</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm doing some performance benchmarks on Intel's mkl right now and I noticed some unexpected issues. When using dgemm_() function instead of cblas_dgemm() on the same matrix I get around 4 times fewer Gflop/s. It's the same either with the non-parallel and parallel version. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Did someone experience similiar things or could probably point me to a possible failure?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 17:38:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/dgemm-vs-cblas-dgemm/m-p/883909#M9859</guid>
      <dc:creator>cutio</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-22T17:38:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

