<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hi, in OpenCL* for CPU</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/OpenCL-for-CPU/Consistent-device-ordering-from-clGetDeviceIDs/m-p/985932#M2650</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;With the release of the Intel OpenCL SDK R3, can you confirm if this issue has been resolved or not?&amp;nbsp; My quick test doesn't show the issue anymore, but I'd like a more concrete answer.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 07:53:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sean_S_3</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-12-31T07:53:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Consistent device ordering from clGetDeviceIDs?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/OpenCL-for-CPU/Consistent-device-ordering-from-clGetDeviceIDs/m-p/985930#M2648</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;When I run a basic OpenCL hello world on my Intel Core i7-3630QM CPU containing Intel HD Graphics 4000, I query and select the Intel platform, then query the devices and select the first device, and proceed. &amp;nbsp;I just noticed this for the first time, but on some runs I get the CPU, and on others I get the GPU. &amp;nbsp;Is that to be expected? &amp;nbsp;What are the rules regarding this behavior, as I don't see it discussed in the OpenCL specification. &amp;nbsp;I guess that devices may not be consistently ordered between application executions (as I'm witnessing), but I'm concerned that within an application if the order could change unexpectantly. &amp;nbsp;Would someone please clarify this for me?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2013 06:46:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/OpenCL-for-CPU/Consistent-device-ordering-from-clGetDeviceIDs/m-p/985930#M2648</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sean_S_3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-17T06:46:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>We are aware of the issue and</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/OpenCL-for-CPU/Consistent-device-ordering-from-clGetDeviceIDs/m-p/985931#M2649</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are aware of the issue and it will be fixed in a future release and will notify here.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Raghu&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 20:20:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/OpenCL-for-CPU/Consistent-device-ordering-from-clGetDeviceIDs/m-p/985931#M2649</guid>
      <dc:creator>Raghupathi_M_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-19T20:20:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/OpenCL-for-CPU/Consistent-device-ordering-from-clGetDeviceIDs/m-p/985932#M2650</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;With the release of the Intel OpenCL SDK R3, can you confirm if this issue has been resolved or not?&amp;nbsp; My quick test doesn't show the issue anymore, but I'd like a more concrete answer.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 07:53:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/OpenCL-for-CPU/Consistent-device-ordering-from-clGetDeviceIDs/m-p/985932#M2650</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sean_S_3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-31T07:53:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I can confirm this is still</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/OpenCL-for-CPU/Consistent-device-ordering-from-clGetDeviceIDs/m-p/985933#M2651</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I can confirm this is still an issue with CL_DRIVER_VERSION 10.18.10.3345.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 23:46:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/OpenCL-for-CPU/Consistent-device-ordering-from-clGetDeviceIDs/m-p/985933#M2651</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sean_S_3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-01T23:46:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Generally, it is better to</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/OpenCL-for-CPU/Consistent-device-ordering-from-clGetDeviceIDs/m-p/985934#M2652</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Generally, it is better to rely on the Device Type (clCreateContextFromType), not the device order.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 08:26:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/OpenCL-for-CPU/Consistent-device-ordering-from-clGetDeviceIDs/m-p/985934#M2652</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maxim_S_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-03T08:26:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

