topic OpenCL compilation crashes in OpenCL* for CPU

OpenCL compilation crashes

yagecheetah — Thu, 26 Jul 2012 20:08:38 GMT

Hi All,

The following code crashes the compiler:

[cpp]kernel void helloWorld(global const char* text, global int* retVal) { for(int i = 0; i < 1; i++) { char c = text; if (c == 2) { i += 1; } else if (c == 3) { //If this is commented, the kernel is compiled i += 1; } else if (c != '\n' && c != '\r' && c != '\t') { retVal[1]++; } } }[/cpp]

My initial thought was I was using incorrect types etc., but then I discovered that if the 9th line is commented out, the code compiles with no problem whatsoever.

If anybody has some clues, there would be much appreciated.

I'm running this on Windows 7. I'm using Intel OpenCL SDK offline compiler. The following is the SDK log:

Using default instruction set architecture.

Intel OpenCL CPU device was found!

Device name: Intel Core i5-2557M CPU @ 1.70GHz

Device version: OpenCL 1.1 (Build 31360.31441)

Device vendor: Intel Corporation

Device profile: FULL_PROFILE

OpenCL compilation crashes

Brijender_B_Intel — Thu, 26 Jul 2012 20:22:44 GMT

Thanks alot. i see an issue, we will update you soon.

OpenCL compilation crashes

Raghupathi_M_Intel — Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:23:19 GMT

Thanks for providing the code. This issue has been fixed and will be in available in the next release.

Thanks,
Raghu

OpenCL compilation crashes

yagecheetah — Mon, 30 Jul 2012 08:17:33 GMT

Hi Raghu,

Thanks for a prompt fix - could you also clarify which software it is related to? Is it full open CL sdk, or is there a separate update for a particular dlls? Is the release date already decided, and if not, is there an early access to nightly builds?

Many thanks,

Michael

OpenCL compilation crashes

Raghupathi_M_Intel — Mon, 30 Jul 2012 08:32:16 GMT

Hi Michael,

It'll be a full SDK release. I don't have a date yet, but will post here once I get more details. Alternately, you can watch the official Intel OpenCL SDK site for any announcements including access to Beta or this Forum.

Thanks,
Raghu