<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hello John Doe, in OpenCL* for CPU</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/OpenCL-for-CPU/Recommended-CPU-for-One-API-development/m-p/1168387#M6487</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello John Doe,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Those interested in One API can see &lt;A href="https://newsroom.intel.com/news/intels-one-api-project-delivers-unified-programming-model-across-diverse-architectures?gs_ref=YntDUNjQIc-Email&amp;amp;utm_source=Email&amp;amp;utm_medium=ShareButton&amp;amp;utm_campaign=GetSocial"&gt;public information at the Intel newsroom&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the interest. At this time, the&amp;nbsp;ability to comment on said technologies&amp;nbsp;is limited. However, it would be constructive&amp;nbsp;to follow what developer aspirations are. Can you share what kinds of projects you're interested in developing? Also, what are your perceptions of current open programming standards&amp;nbsp;for applications of interest?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Intel&amp;nbsp;software development teams&amp;nbsp;browse the forums and customer comments may&amp;nbsp;influence priorities.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If customer project scope is too proprietary or private to be shared no worries... Please request to be contacted via private message if interested in sharing more.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some comments about for&amp;nbsp;preferring particular vendor products:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In general, if you want something&amp;nbsp;to be supported, alert your vendor (as the first post accomplishes). As indicated above, a critical mass of customer communication can influence priorities.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;In an OpenCL context, perhaps a developer could consider the frequency of Intel® Graphics driver redistribution releases as part of their purchasing decisions.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;OEM's repackage OpenCL implementations as part of Windows* OS Intel® Graphics Drivers. OEMs choose the frequency at which they quality assure,&amp;nbsp;adopt, support, and publish releases.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Some OEM's perform this action&amp;nbsp;more often than others. It may be in&amp;nbsp;your interest to review update frequency&amp;nbsp;provided on vendor support pages... or communicate with OEMs on why a particular technology is important to you. Request that technology&amp;nbsp;to be a priority.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the post,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-MichaelC&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 18:14:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Michael_C_Intel1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-09-30T18:14:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Recommended CPU for One API development?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/OpenCL-for-CPU/Recommended-CPU-for-One-API-development/m-p/1168386#M6486</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I need to buy a new workstation now, and want to make sure it's a good choice for One API development in Q4 2019.&amp;nbsp; I realize this is an OpenCL forum, not One API, but I imagine there's overlap.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm looking at a Core i7 9700 with UHD Graphics 630.&amp;nbsp; It's a Dell Precision 3431.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'll have to use the integrated GPU until discrete Intel GPUs are released in 2020.&amp;nbsp; I imagine One API support for Nvidia or AMD GPUs will not be great.&amp;nbsp; I've used SYCL before, and I'm aware that not all hardware is supported.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There's not much online about One API at the moment, but can anyone speculate on what would be a good system to buy now?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 19:02:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/OpenCL-for-CPU/Recommended-CPU-for-One-API-development/m-p/1168386#M6486</guid>
      <dc:creator>Doe__John1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-24T19:02:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello John Doe,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/OpenCL-for-CPU/Recommended-CPU-for-One-API-development/m-p/1168387#M6487</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello John Doe,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Those interested in One API can see &lt;A href="https://newsroom.intel.com/news/intels-one-api-project-delivers-unified-programming-model-across-diverse-architectures?gs_ref=YntDUNjQIc-Email&amp;amp;utm_source=Email&amp;amp;utm_medium=ShareButton&amp;amp;utm_campaign=GetSocial"&gt;public information at the Intel newsroom&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the interest. At this time, the&amp;nbsp;ability to comment on said technologies&amp;nbsp;is limited. However, it would be constructive&amp;nbsp;to follow what developer aspirations are. Can you share what kinds of projects you're interested in developing? Also, what are your perceptions of current open programming standards&amp;nbsp;for applications of interest?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Intel&amp;nbsp;software development teams&amp;nbsp;browse the forums and customer comments may&amp;nbsp;influence priorities.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If customer project scope is too proprietary or private to be shared no worries... Please request to be contacted via private message if interested in sharing more.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some comments about for&amp;nbsp;preferring particular vendor products:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In general, if you want something&amp;nbsp;to be supported, alert your vendor (as the first post accomplishes). As indicated above, a critical mass of customer communication can influence priorities.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;In an OpenCL context, perhaps a developer could consider the frequency of Intel® Graphics driver redistribution releases as part of their purchasing decisions.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;OEM's repackage OpenCL implementations as part of Windows* OS Intel® Graphics Drivers. OEMs choose the frequency at which they quality assure,&amp;nbsp;adopt, support, and publish releases.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Some OEM's perform this action&amp;nbsp;more often than others. It may be in&amp;nbsp;your interest to review update frequency&amp;nbsp;provided on vendor support pages... or communicate with OEMs on why a particular technology is important to you. Request that technology&amp;nbsp;to be a priority.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the post,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-MichaelC&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 18:14:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/OpenCL-for-CPU/Recommended-CPU-for-One-API-development/m-p/1168387#M6487</guid>
      <dc:creator>Michael_C_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-30T18:14:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Michael, thanks for the</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/OpenCL-for-CPU/Recommended-CPU-for-One-API-development/m-p/1168388#M6488</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Michael, thanks for the response.&amp;nbsp; After posting, I found &lt;A href="https://github.com/intel/llvm/tree/sycl/sycl"&gt;Intel's SYCL repo on Github&lt;/A&gt;.&amp;nbsp; I realize it hasn't been released yet, and information is limited right now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm interested in image processing with OpenAPI.&amp;nbsp; CUDA is by far the top choice in my field, but I want to explore alternatives.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I ended up ordering the Dell Precision 3431 I mentioned, but with an i9-9900.&amp;nbsp; I'm betting that anything with gen9 graphics will be OK for getting started with OneAPI.&amp;nbsp; I realize this will all change in 2020.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gen11 graphics seems appealing, but I wanted a desktop CPU.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You raise interesting points about OEM support for OpenCL drivers.&amp;nbsp; I didn't realize there was any variation in support with respect to this.&amp;nbsp; I'll do more research.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 04:22:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/OpenCL-for-CPU/Recommended-CPU-for-One-API-development/m-p/1168388#M6488</guid>
      <dc:creator>Doe__John1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-01T04:22:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>John Doe,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/OpenCL-for-CPU/Recommended-CPU-for-One-API-development/m-p/1168389#M6489</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;John Doe,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the feedback.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On image processing:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OpenCV is an enabling technology that comes up quite a bit among&amp;nbsp;developers interested in image processing regardless of use case. It's encapsulated and a pretty straightforward starting point. It's slightly extensible... It can be good before going to a more general purpose opportunity&amp;nbsp;like an OpenCL or SYCL when needed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On alternatives (at the risk of sounding like a broken record):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;I speak with many customers who value maximizing future proofing and enhanced portability... That typically maps&amp;nbsp;to the desire&amp;nbsp;to explore open standard alternatives...&amp;nbsp;Tell your vendor, tell your OEM what open standard you're interested in making a priority and how.&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;If it is a priority, it may help to keep it a priority.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;If it isn't a priority, it may&amp;nbsp;help to realign priorities.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;-MichaelC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 18:07:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/OpenCL-for-CPU/Recommended-CPU-for-One-API-development/m-p/1168389#M6489</guid>
      <dc:creator>Michael_C_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-01T18:07:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

