<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Core i7 920: C0 VS D0 in Mobile and Desktop Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/Core-i7-920-C0-VS-D0/m-p/345275#M11717</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;i would go for the D0 i had the C0 and it was good but the D0 is a much more stable and higher overclocker if thats what you are looking for. my C0 only clocked to 4389mhz @1.550v (not stable might i add)yet my D0 will clock up to 4720mhz @1.550v and was able to run for over 30min at 100% load till i shut it off as i was just testing it i would not do that for long. i no all chips are diffrent but this is a large jump in stability&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 06:50:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-06-06T06:50:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Core i7 920: C0 VS D0</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/Core-i7-920-C0-VS-D0/m-p/345274#M11716</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Everyone!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to get your opinions on the old C0 Stepping vs the new D0 Stepping.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For reference here is the errata(error) documentation: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://download.intel.com/design/processor/specupdt/320836.pdf"&gt;http://download.intel.com/design/processor/specupdt/320836.pdf&lt;/A&gt; &lt;A href="http://download.intel.com/design/processor/specupdt/320836.pdf"&gt;http://download.intel.com/design/processor/specupdt/320836.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 05:05:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/Core-i7-920-C0-VS-D0/m-p/345274#M11716</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-05T05:05:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Core i7 920: C0 VS D0</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/Core-i7-920-C0-VS-D0/m-p/345275#M11717</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;i would go for the D0 i had the C0 and it was good but the D0 is a much more stable and higher overclocker if thats what you are looking for. my C0 only clocked to 4389mhz @1.550v (not stable might i add)yet my D0 will clock up to 4720mhz @1.550v and was able to run for over 30min at 100% load till i shut it off as i was just testing it i would not do that for long. i no all chips are diffrent but this is a large jump in stability&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 06:50:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/Core-i7-920-C0-VS-D0/m-p/345275#M11717</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-06T06:50:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

