<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Memory Management Unit and Chipset in Mobile and Desktop Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/Memory-Management-Unit-and-Chipset/m-p/444737#M20185</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you rephrase your question please?  I don't have a clear picture of your concern yet.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:16:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-25T21:16:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Memory Management Unit and Chipset</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/Memory-Management-Unit-and-Chipset/m-p/444736#M20184</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;if 64 bit microprocessor can function with enhanced very large memory without the 64 bit nomer , then 32 bit microprocessors could be 16 bit .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Because software can simulate 32 bit math using carry over Math !!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If this discussion was started already ,, redirection link is useful. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;PPC-64&lt;/B&gt; bit is in planning.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;Thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 23:35:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/Memory-Management-Unit-and-Chipset/m-p/444736#M20184</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-07T23:35:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Memory Management Unit and Chipset</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/Memory-Management-Unit-and-Chipset/m-p/444737#M20185</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you rephrase your question please?  I don't have a clear picture of your concern yet.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:16:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/Memory-Management-Unit-and-Chipset/m-p/444737#M20185</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-25T21:16:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Memory Management Unit and Chipset</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/Memory-Management-Unit-and-Chipset/m-p/444738#M20186</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think the poster was saying that what pushed 32-bit out of spotlight , and 64-bit into spotlight  ??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Because System Software Developer were complaining that value of 64-bit is not Null but Zero ; Perhaps Minus .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;? AMD about 10 year ago announced the first 64-bit Design with Intel following within 1 year and 1.5 year ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;32-bit 386 has Cache , or Extended Memory , in the 486 .  Then access to transient memory store or RAM does not require a 64-bit Microprocessor because&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;64-bit nomer or name is just the internal memory or Register Memory .  Which is expensive .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Microprocessor have addressed to MMC or Memory Management Control ( a multiplex circuit ) .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would of been doable has augment to System V as Monolithic Kernel and perhap maintained as Lithic Microkernel .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:10:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/Memory-Management-Unit-and-Chipset/m-p/444738#M20186</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-27T06:10:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

