<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Does DDIO support for remote socket? in Mobile and Desktop Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/Does-DDIO-support-for-remote-socket/m-p/1349017#M55726</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;From the documentation, DDIO can only work at local socket and rdma read/write can only access memory directly though UPI/QPI.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I do an experiment on it. The basic idea is that:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;At local socket, rdma read will access memory directly. After a rdma write of the same address, the data will be allocated in LLC and the next rdma read will access data in LLC, which takes less latency. We can see a difference between the latency of two read operations.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;At remote socket, rdma read and read after write bothhave to access memory directly and there will not be much difference of the read latency.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;By experimentation, local socket rdma read obeys our thought indeed. But read latency of remote socket still shows the difference where we think that DDIO should not work.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My question is that:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Does DDIO work for remote socket?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. If not, what makes the differences of the latency of read and that of read_after_write?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 12:50:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>oleotiger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-01-06T12:50:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Does DDIO support for remote socket?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/Does-DDIO-support-for-remote-socket/m-p/1349017#M55726</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;From the documentation, DDIO can only work at local socket and rdma read/write can only access memory directly though UPI/QPI.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I do an experiment on it. The basic idea is that:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;At local socket, rdma read will access memory directly. After a rdma write of the same address, the data will be allocated in LLC and the next rdma read will access data in LLC, which takes less latency. We can see a difference between the latency of two read operations.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;At remote socket, rdma read and read after write bothhave to access memory directly and there will not be much difference of the read latency.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;By experimentation, local socket rdma read obeys our thought indeed. But read latency of remote socket still shows the difference where we think that DDIO should not work.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My question is that:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Does DDIO work for remote socket?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. If not, what makes the differences of the latency of read and that of read_after_write?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 12:50:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/Does-DDIO-support-for-remote-socket/m-p/1349017#M55726</guid>
      <dc:creator>oleotiger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-06T12:50:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does DDIO support for remote socket?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/Does-DDIO-support-for-remote-socket/m-p/1353063#M55984</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Any one can help?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 12:31:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/Does-DDIO-support-for-remote-socket/m-p/1353063#M55984</guid>
      <dc:creator>oleotiger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-20T12:31:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does DDIO support for remote socket?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/Does-DDIO-support-for-remote-socket/m-p/1557097#M67934</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;DDIO works for remote socket. It will cache data in the remote LLC.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2023 10:24:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/Does-DDIO-support-for-remote-socket/m-p/1557097#M67934</guid>
      <dc:creator>OMEGA00</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-24T10:24:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

