<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IM a bit confused.  what is better? QX9650 or Q9650 in Mobile and Desktop Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/IM-a-bit-confused-what-is-better-QX9650-or-Q9650/m-p/327469#M9327</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;TY thats what i thought. i dont think ill over clock im goign to get the reg  quad  core..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is n2 and r 44 refrigerants? im a sheetmetal worker  and build my own comp. but never had any but air cooled.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 02:04:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-10-08T02:04:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IM a bit confused.  what is better? QX9650 or Q9650</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/IM-a-bit-confused-what-is-better-QX9650-or-Q9650/m-p/327466#M9324</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;my motherboard supports both but i cant tell the difference. and i wanted to upgrade to a quadcore. im very handy but not upto date  on the technology.  is the Qx a quad core?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 02:50:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/IM-a-bit-confused-what-is-better-QX9650-or-Q9650/m-p/327466#M9324</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-07T02:50:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IM a bit confused.  what is better? QX9650 or Q9650</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/IM-a-bit-confused-what-is-better-QX9650-or-Q9650/m-p/327467#M9325</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See here:&lt;A href="http://ark.intel.com/Compare.aspx?ids=33921,35428"&gt;http://ark.intel.com/Compare.aspx?ids=33921,35428&lt;/A&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They are essentially teh same CPU, apart from the the QX has an unlocked multiplier, whilst the Q has VT.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 07:03:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/IM-a-bit-confused-what-is-better-QX9650-or-Q9650/m-p/327467#M9325</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-07T07:03:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IM a bit confused.  what is better? QX9650 or Q9650</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/IM-a-bit-confused-what-is-better-QX9650-or-Q9650/m-p/327468#M9326</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The questions you should ask yourself are:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do I plan to over-clock on Water or Phase (N2, R44)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do I plan on spending $70+ on very high end air cooler?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the answer is no to them get the Q9650.  If it's yes to ether get the QX9650. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They are the same chip and die, slightly different firmware.  The difference is the over-clock ability.  The QX can easily hit 4Ghz but you need to dump 125+W of heat.  &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 23:42:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/IM-a-bit-confused-what-is-better-QX9650-or-Q9650/m-p/327468#M9326</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-07T23:42:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IM a bit confused.  what is better? QX9650 or Q9650</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/IM-a-bit-confused-what-is-better-QX9650-or-Q9650/m-p/327469#M9327</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;TY thats what i thought. i dont think ill over clock im goign to get the reg  quad  core..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is n2 and r 44 refrigerants? im a sheetmetal worker  and build my own comp. but never had any but air cooled.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 02:04:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/IM-a-bit-confused-what-is-better-QX9650-or-Q9650/m-p/327469#M9327</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-08T02:04:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IM a bit confused.  what is better? QX9650 or Q9650</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/IM-a-bit-confused-what-is-better-QX9650-or-Q9650/m-p/327470#M9328</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;N2 or N2 refers to liquid nitrogen.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R-44 is a typo meant to be R-404, a refrigerant blend preferred by extreme phase change overclockers due to its -46.5° boiling point one of the lowest available that is compatible with off the shelf compressors.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 03:21:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/IM-a-bit-confused-what-is-better-QX9650-or-Q9650/m-p/327470#M9328</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-08T03:21:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IM a bit confused.  what is better? QX9650 or Q9650</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/IM-a-bit-confused-what-is-better-QX9650-or-Q9650/m-p/327471#M9329</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Go with the QX9650 , it has unlocked multiplier , So if you do want to raise the clock it is much easer  and you don't have to raise the FSB much. I have one running at 3.8 for about a year now stays at 44C stable and fast . New ones are hard to find But they are still around for $ 260.00 . where you are going to spend about $325. for a new Q9650.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:50:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/IM-a-bit-confused-what-is-better-QX9650-or-Q9650/m-p/327471#M9329</guid>
      <dc:creator>RGiff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-08T15:50:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IM a bit confused.  what is better? QX9650 or Q9650</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/IM-a-bit-confused-what-is-better-QX9650-or-Q9650/m-p/327472#M9330</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;ty&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 21:43:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/IM-a-bit-confused-what-is-better-QX9650-or-Q9650/m-p/327472#M9330</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-08T21:43:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IM a bit confused.  what is better? QX9650 or Q9650</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/IM-a-bit-confused-what-is-better-QX9650-or-Q9650/m-p/327473#M9331</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't mean to confuse you , But you have to understand , Intel stoped making the QX9650 two years ago , they still make the Q9650. That is why the QX9650 are SO Sought after . They can be had at places like Ebay new for about $260.00 new If you look around and fine someone you can trust . The Q9650 Retails for about $325.00 in sttores. That in and of it self makes the QX9650 a much better choice if you can get a good one .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 13:38:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/IM-a-bit-confused-what-is-better-QX9650-or-Q9650/m-p/327473#M9331</guid>
      <dc:creator>RGiff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-09T13:38:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

