<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Intel Module Server Network Layout and Switch Capabilities in Intel® Xeon® Processor and Server Products</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Xeon-Processor-and-Server/Intel-Module-Server-Network-Layout-and-Switch-Capabilities/m-p/293513#M4433</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I personaly don't understand why we need it, but our network guy is claiming that we need a proper core switch because it will make the entire newtwork more efficient. He is wanting to set up several vlans and as far as i know the IMS switch can do that as well. What we have so far is as follows.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(5) T1 lines going to other private institutions into (2) Cisco 1941 routers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(2) T1 internet lines for out web servers connected to&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(2) DSL lines for internet access in our main office&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;all of the above internet lines go into a Cisco 2901 Router&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All of the routers then connect to a Cisco 2960 interconnectivity switch&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then it passes through  Sonic wall NSA2400 Firewall appliace&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;now is where i have the issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Option A IMS switches&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Option B Cisco 3560&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then to (4) cisco 2960 access switches with POE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then to roughly 50 IP phone with pass thru to workstations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We previously had a much smaller network and added about 40 users so we had to rework things and bring in additional servers. I don't want to overcomplicate things and I am frankly sick of buying equipment. However if its needed or will benefit us in any way I have no problem doing so.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:47:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-12T12:47:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Intel Module Server Network Layout and Switch Capabilities</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Xeon-Processor-and-Server/Intel-Module-Server-Network-Layout-and-Switch-Capabilities/m-p/293511#M4431</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have just purchased an Intel Modular Server with 6 Modules, 2nd Switch, and an extra NIC for each module. Our network is roughly 50 users each with a PC and an IP phone. We have about 20 users running applications that stream Stock market data feeds throughout the day. My question is as follows..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can the switches built into the IMS act as our core switches with Cisco Catalyst 2960( 24 10/100 PoE) acting as access switches reliably?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or should I use something like Cisco Catalyst 3560 in between the IMS switches and the Cisco 2960 Access swiches?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:55:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Xeon-Processor-and-Server/Intel-Module-Server-Network-Layout-and-Switch-Capabilities/m-p/293511#M4431</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-10T12:55:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intel Module Server Network Layout and Switch Capabilities</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Xeon-Processor-and-Server/Intel-Module-Server-Network-Layout-and-Switch-Capabilities/m-p/293512#M4432</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That setup should work just fine.  Is there anything specific you need the "core switch" to do?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:04:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Xeon-Processor-and-Server/Intel-Module-Server-Network-Layout-and-Switch-Capabilities/m-p/293512#M4432</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel_O_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-11T00:04:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intel Module Server Network Layout and Switch Capabilities</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Xeon-Processor-and-Server/Intel-Module-Server-Network-Layout-and-Switch-Capabilities/m-p/293513#M4433</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I personaly don't understand why we need it, but our network guy is claiming that we need a proper core switch because it will make the entire newtwork more efficient. He is wanting to set up several vlans and as far as i know the IMS switch can do that as well. What we have so far is as follows.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(5) T1 lines going to other private institutions into (2) Cisco 1941 routers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(2) T1 internet lines for out web servers connected to&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(2) DSL lines for internet access in our main office&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;all of the above internet lines go into a Cisco 2901 Router&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All of the routers then connect to a Cisco 2960 interconnectivity switch&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then it passes through  Sonic wall NSA2400 Firewall appliace&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;now is where i have the issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Option A IMS switches&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Option B Cisco 3560&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then to (4) cisco 2960 access switches with POE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then to roughly 50 IP phone with pass thru to workstations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We previously had a much smaller network and added about 40 users so we had to rework things and bring in additional servers. I don't want to overcomplicate things and I am frankly sick of buying equipment. However if its needed or will benefit us in any way I have no problem doing so.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:47:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Xeon-Processor-and-Server/Intel-Module-Server-Network-Layout-and-Switch-Capabilities/m-p/293513#M4433</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-12T12:47:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intel Module Server Network Layout and Switch Capabilities</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Xeon-Processor-and-Server/Intel-Module-Server-Network-Layout-and-Switch-Capabilities/m-p/293514#M4434</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't see why adding another switch would be more efficient, but I would probably trust the network guy since he's more familiar with the setup.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 01:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Xeon-Processor-and-Server/Intel-Module-Server-Network-Layout-and-Switch-Capabilities/m-p/293514#M4434</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel_O_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-13T01:31:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

