<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VT-x and VT-d Dependency in Software Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/VT-x-and-VT-d-Dependency/m-p/891871#M10256</link>
    <description>VT-x is a processor feature and VT-d is a chipset feature. They are independent.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Then again, you usually use VT-d to avoid VM exits that are caused by VT-x. So this and other usage scenarios connect them in practice.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-d&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:33:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>David_O_Intel1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-03-02T18:33:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VT-x and VT-d Dependency</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/VT-x-and-VT-d-Dependency/m-p/891870#M10255</link>
      <description>Can any one let me know How much is VT-d isolated from VT-x ? and In What Way?&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:14:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/VT-x-and-VT-d-Dependency/m-p/891870#M10255</guid>
      <dc:creator>bodke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-27T23:14:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VT-x and VT-d Dependency</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/VT-x-and-VT-d-Dependency/m-p/891871#M10256</link>
      <description>VT-x is a processor feature and VT-d is a chipset feature. They are independent.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Then again, you usually use VT-d to avoid VM exits that are caused by VT-x. So this and other usage scenarios connect them in practice.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-d&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:33:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/VT-x-and-VT-d-Dependency/m-p/891871#M10256</guid>
      <dc:creator>David_O_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-02T18:33:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VT-x and VT-d Dependency</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/VT-x-and-VT-d-Dependency/m-p/891872#M10257</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;Forgot to add that a nice place to look for technical info on VT-x and VT-d is an older issue of the Intel Technology Journal. It showcases Intel Virtualization with a number of articles.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.intel.com/technology/itj/2006/v10i3"&gt;http://www.intel.com/technology/itj/2006/v10i3&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:39:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/VT-x-and-VT-d-Dependency/m-p/891872#M10257</guid>
      <dc:creator>David_O_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-02T18:39:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

