<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Reduced Clock/Timing Resolution on a Xeon? in Software Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Reduced-Clock-Timing-Resolution-on-a-Xeon/m-p/910039#M11831</link>
    <description>In developing software that runs on a Dell Presision machine with a Xeon processor, I have found that using Sleep() and SetWaitableTimer() only has a 15ms resolution. The same code running on my desktop which is a Dell Dimension 5150 with a Pentium processor has a timing resolution down to the millisecond for those same function calls. Both machines run Windows XP Pro SP2 and have DirectX 9.0c. Is there a way to fix the time resolution on the Xeon machine? Thanks - Noelle</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:35:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>noellepavlovicz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-09-22T21:35:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Reduced Clock/Timing Resolution on a Xeon?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Reduced-Clock-Timing-Resolution-on-a-Xeon/m-p/910039#M11831</link>
      <description>In developing software that runs on a Dell Presision machine with a Xeon processor, I have found that using Sleep() and SetWaitableTimer() only has a 15ms resolution. The same code running on my desktop which is a Dell Dimension 5150 with a Pentium processor has a timing resolution down to the millisecond for those same function calls. Both machines run Windows XP Pro SP2 and have DirectX 9.0c. Is there a way to fix the time resolution on the Xeon machine? Thanks - Noelle</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:35:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Reduced-Clock-Timing-Resolution-on-a-Xeon/m-p/910039#M11831</guid>
      <dc:creator>noellepavlovicz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-09-22T21:35:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Reduced Clock/Timing Resolution on a Xeon?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Reduced-Clock-Timing-Resolution-on-a-Xeon/m-p/910040#M11832</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Arial" size="2"&gt;Here are a couple of different suggestions we've gotten for you from our engineering team:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Arial" size="2"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;From one engineer:&lt;/EM&gt;S&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="Arial" size="2"&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;ome Dell* machines come with the HPET multimedia timer turned off in the BIOS by default, and it's quite possible that Windows* uses this for the higher accuracy timer. The first thing I always do with Dell machines is turn HPET on in theBIOS (Linux* does use HPET) so maybe that is something worth trying...it could be thatyour non-server machine has this already turned on.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Arial" size="2"&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;From another engineer:&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;FONT size="2"&gt;I'm very curious about the .015 second resolution reported for the Intel Xeon processor-based system. 1/60 = 0.01667, very close to the .015 second report. Could it be counting line frequency?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Arial" size="2"&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;==&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Arial" size="2"&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;
&lt;P class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;Lexi S.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;IntelSoftware NetworkSupport&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.intel.com/software"&gt;http://www.intel.com/software&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.intel.com/cd/ids/developer/asmo-na/eng/58987.htm"&gt;Contact us&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Reduced-Clock-Timing-Resolution-on-a-Xeon/m-p/910040#M11832</guid>
      <dc:creator>Intel_Software_Netw1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-09-26T07:00:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Reduced Clock/Timing Resolution on a Xeon?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Reduced-Clock-Timing-Resolution-on-a-Xeon/m-p/910041#M11833</link>
      <description>Thanks for the reply. I'll have to look into the HPET in the BIOS. The solution I have found that works is calling timeBeginPeriod(1) at the start of my thread. This is setting the windows multimedia clock/timer to a 1ms resolution according to the MSDN docs. I am assuming then that SetWaitableTimer() is using that same clock since this fixes my problem.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Once I can get back on the Xeon machine I'll check the BIOS for the HPET multimedia timer and let you know. I would not be surprised if it is turned off since hyperthreading was off by default too.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:15:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Reduced-Clock-Timing-Resolution-on-a-Xeon/m-p/910041#M11833</guid>
      <dc:creator>noellepavlovicz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-09-27T22:15:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

