User Controlled Power Management

Andrey_R_ — Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:17:47 GMT

Hi everyone,

I need to perform fine-precision performance measurements on MIC and experience considerable variance due to DVFS.

I was tracking the frequency and voltage using 'micinfo' tool with 1 second resolution. I did 2 experiment executions of exactly the same test and the results are attached. The first experiment was run just after resetting the coprocessor, and the initial frequency was 1.04 GHz. During the 1st experiment execution the frequency dropped from 1.04GHz to 0.84GHz. With the drop of frequency the clocksource changed from 'tsc' to less precise 'micetc'. During the 2nd experiment execution the frequency was 0.84GHz during the whole experiment, but the voltage changed as it is depicted on the chart. So can anybody clarify the following questions:

1. During changes of the voltage the frequency stays the same (except one discrete drop from 1.04GHz to 0.84GHz due to PROCHOT interrupt) according to the output of micinfo. But as far as I see in Datasheet (June, 2013) Figure 5-8 the frequency should drop together with voltage except Low Frequency Mode zone. So can I conclude from voltage change that coprocessor swithces to different P-states as voltage changes? And micinfo doesn't show exact value of the frequency, does it?

2. Is there a way to force the coprocessor to operate in the lowest possible voltage and frequency state Pn or any other user defined (say 960000uV)?

3. As I can see in System Software Developer Guide (June, 2013) Figure 3-1 there is User Mode PM console app to contol Power Management. Does anybody know the details for that app?

Thank you!

Below is dmesg output, Power Management Configuration and micinfo output.

dmesg output (during frequency drop from 1.04GHz to 0.84GHz):

[ 458.685498] PROCHOT interrupt
[ 459.180135] Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -122042579 ns)
[ 459.180719] Switching to clocksource micetc
[ 516.684694] RAS.get_freq: core not running at expected frequency

....

[ 862.973207] PROCHOT interrupt
[ 862.982334] Setting maxfreq to 800000
[ 862.982355] Failed to update cpufreq policy
[ 863.132325] Setting maxfreq to 0
[ 863.132340] Failed to update cpufreq policy

Power Management was configured that way:
/etc/sysconfig/mic/mic0.conf
...
PowerManagement "cpufreq_off;corec6_off;pc3_off;pc6_off"

Here is the configuration of MIC I have:
...
    Version
        Flash Version         : 2.1.03.0386
        SMC Firmware Version    : 1.15.4830
        SMC Boot Loader Version    : 1.8.4326
        uOS Version         : 2.6.38.8+mpss3.1
        Device Serial Number     : ADKC25101431

    Board
        Vendor ID         : 0x8086
        Device ID         : 0x2250
        Subsystem ID         : 0x2500
        Coprocessor Stepping ID    : 3
        PCIe Width         : x16
        PCIe Speed         : 5 GT/s
        PCIe Max payload size    : 256 bytes
        PCIe Max read req size    : 512 bytes
        Coprocessor Model    : 0x01
        Coprocessor Model Ext    : 0x00
        Coprocessor Type    : 0x00
        Coprocessor Family    : 0x0b
        Coprocessor Family Ext    : 0x00
        Coprocessor Stepping     : B1
        Board SKU         : B1PRQ-5110P/5120D
        ECC Mode         : Enabled
        SMC HW Revision     : Product 225W Passive CS

Andrey,

TaylorIoTKidd — Tue, 10 Dec 2013 22:49:25 GMT

Andrey,

Excellent questions. I am consulting the experts here at Intel.

Note: As it is the holiday season, the experts may not be available until the new year. I will do my best to get you an answer before then.

Regards
--
Taylor

Taylor, I have read a number

Andrey_R_ — Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:35:30 GMT

Taylor, I have read a number of your posts at Intel blog on power management and they were very helpful. Thank you for that and for your reply!

Thanks. Your question is

TaylorIoTKidd — Wed, 11 Dec 2013 18:12:58 GMT

Thanks. Your question is great because I am starting a new blog series on measuring power come the new year.

After updating MPSS version

Andrey_R_ — Thu, 03 Apr 2014 19:06:08 GMT

After updating MPSS version to the following one:

    Version
        Flash Version         : 2.1.02.0390
        SMC Firmware Version    : 1.16.5078
        SMC Boot Loader Version    : 1.8.4326
        uOS Version         : 2.6.38.8+mpss3.1.1
        Device Serial Number     : ADKC25101431

the voltage variabilty on the same test became insignificant +- 0.001V.

topic User Controlled Power Management in Software Archive

User Controlled Power Management

Andrey,

Taylor, I have read a number

Thanks. Your question is

After updating MPSS version