<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Yes, one would expect mkl in Software Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Issues-linking-with-sequential-MKL-on-native-MIC-code/m-p/936534#M15997</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, one would expect mkl_sequential to stub out get_threads calls from inside MKL and simply set 1 thread.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 13:52:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-27T13:52:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Issues linking with sequential MKL on native MIC code.</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Issues-linking-with-sequential-MKL-on-native-MIC-code/m-p/936527#M15990</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am trying to link a sequential version of MKL with my code for some testing. I am using ICC 13.0.1 (20121010). When I link it I get an undefined reference error:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;icc -g -Wall -Wextra -O3 -mmic -o test_v5_pth main.o -L/opt/apps/intel13_1/mkl/11/lib/mic -lmkl_intel_lp64 -lmkl_sequential -lmkl_core -lpthread -lm&lt;BR /&gt;/opt/apps/intel13_1/mkl/11/lib/mic/libmkl_core.so: undefined reference to `omp_get_max_threads'&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Obviously if I and -liomp5 I can get over the omp_get_max_threads, but I am wondering why does mkl_core reference omp_get_max_threads when I am trying to compile a sequential version of it. Is this a known issue or am I required to link with libiomp5, this is not what MKL link advisor gives me either.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:24:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Issues-linking-with-sequential-MKL-on-native-MIC-code/m-p/936527#M15990</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bharath_R_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-19T14:24:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This is probably an issue for</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Issues-linking-with-sequential-MKL-on-native-MIC-code/m-p/936528#M15991</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is probably an issue for older versions of ICC and MKL. I tried with a recent version (ICC 13.1.0 20130121) and it didn't have this problem. Please consider upgrade your Composer XE. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Issues-linking-with-sequential-MKL-on-native-MIC-code/m-p/936528#M15991</guid>
      <dc:creator>Zhang_Z_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-19T17:42:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks for the information, I</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Issues-linking-with-sequential-MKL-on-native-MIC-code/m-p/936529#M15992</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the information, I will look into upgrading to the newer version of Intel Composer suite.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:57:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Issues-linking-with-sequential-MKL-on-native-MIC-code/m-p/936529#M15992</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bharath_R_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-19T17:57:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Building with the compiler</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Issues-linking-with-sequential-MKL-on-native-MIC-code/m-p/936530#M15993</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Building with the compiler option "-mkl" may also solve some of the problems.&amp;nbsp; It knows what libraries to include and does so automatically.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 17:06:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Issues-linking-with-sequential-MKL-on-native-MIC-code/m-p/936530#M15993</guid>
      <dc:creator>Charles_C_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-26T17:06:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>-mkl:sequential seems to be</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Issues-linking-with-sequential-MKL-on-native-MIC-code/m-p/936531#M15994</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;-mkl:sequential seems to be the matching option according to the mention at the top of this thread.&amp;nbsp; It would avoid any problem with wrong order or spelling typos of the library options.&amp;nbsp; Note in &lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-mkl-link-line-advisor" target="_blank"&gt;http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-mkl-link-line-advisor&lt;/A&gt; that you must use the&amp;nbsp; --start-group --end-group options when specifying individual static libraries on linux; that shouldn't have been needed when dynamic libraries are used.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 17:34:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Issues-linking-with-sequential-MKL-on-native-MIC-code/m-p/936531#M15994</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-26T17:34:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Upgrading to the newer</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Issues-linking-with-sequential-MKL-on-native-MIC-code/m-p/936532#M15995</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Upgrading to the newer version of Composer XE fixed the problem.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 17:57:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Issues-linking-with-sequential-MKL-on-native-MIC-code/m-p/936532#M15995</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bharath_R_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-26T17:57:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Just to be clear in the older</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Issues-linking-with-sequential-MKL-on-native-MIC-code/m-p/936533#M15996</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just to be clear in the older version of Composer XE&amp;nbsp;13.0.1 (20121010)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;$ nm libmkl_core.so | grep omp_get_max&lt;BR /&gt; U omp_get_max_threads&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In the newer version&amp;nbsp;13.1.1 (20130313)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;$ nm libmkl_core.so | grep omp_get_max&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Probably there was an issue with the MKL in our older version which got fixed with upgrade.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:02:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Issues-linking-with-sequential-MKL-on-native-MIC-code/m-p/936533#M15996</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bharath_R_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-26T18:02:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yes, one would expect mkl</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Issues-linking-with-sequential-MKL-on-native-MIC-code/m-p/936534#M15997</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, one would expect mkl_sequential to stub out get_threads calls from inside MKL and simply set 1 thread.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 13:52:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Issues-linking-with-sequential-MKL-on-native-MIC-code/m-p/936534#M15997</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-27T13:52:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

