<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hi Eric, in Software Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940269#M16924</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Eric,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I ran the following&amp;nbsp;command:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;mpiexec.hydra -genv I_MPI_SSHM_SCIF 1 -n 2 -host mic0 /tmp/montecarlo.mic :&amp;nbsp; -n 3 -host mic1 /tmp/montecarlo.mic&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Where montecarlo.mic is the binary for&amp;nbsp;Phi. And it worked as expected.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If it still doesn't work for you, could you provide information about your Linux distribution version, the MPSS version (use the command "micinfo"), the Intel compiler version and the Intel MPL library version please.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 23:33:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Loc_N_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-02-27T23:33:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Improving MPI performance between 2 Xeon Phi cards</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940264#M16919</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am trying to improve performance running native MPI version between 2 Xeon Phi cards.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I wanted to test if&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I_MPI_SSHM_SCIF=1 may help, but I encountered the error below:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Fatal error in MPI_Init: Other MPI error, error stack:&lt;BR /&gt;MPIR_Init_thread(647)........................: &lt;BR /&gt;MPID_Init(192)...............................: channel initialization failed&lt;BR /&gt;MPIDI_CH3_Init(100)..........................: &lt;BR /&gt;MPID_nem_impi_shm_scif_connections_init(1864): &lt;BR /&gt;MPID_nem_impi_shm_scif_accept(1956)..........: Internal MPI error! cannot receive peer's rank&lt;BR /&gt;Fatal error in MPI_Init: Other MPI error, error stack:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If I don't set this environment variable, my application is working correctly.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is it worth investigating why this setting is not working? Or is there other setting to optimize MPI communcation between 2 cards or host and one card?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your advice,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Eric.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:35:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940264#M16919</guid>
      <dc:creator>luckynew</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-11T13:35:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Eric,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940265#M16920</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Eric,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Before you launched the application, did you enable the environment variable I_MPI_MIC ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;# export I_MPI_MIC=enable&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The article at &lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/how-to-run-intel-mpi-on-xeon-phi"&gt;http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/how-to-run-intel-mpi-on-xeon-phi&lt;/A&gt; gives a good overview on how to run an MPI program on Intel(R) Xeon Phi(TM).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 23:20:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940265#M16920</guid>
      <dc:creator>Loc_N_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-11T23:20:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Loc-Nguyen,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940266#M16921</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Loc-Nguyen,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your reply!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yes, I use I_MPI_MIC=enable though I never notice bad behaviour without it or performance gain to use it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And, yes, I already know the documentation you referred to.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any other idea about my error, the importance of using&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I_MPI_SSHM_SCIF, or any other flag that may help to speedup communication between 2 cards or host and Xeon Phi?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:11:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940266#M16921</guid>
      <dc:creator>luckynew</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-12T10:11:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940267#M16922</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can you enter the following command and try to run again:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;sudo /sbin/sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:50:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940267#M16922</guid>
      <dc:creator>Loc_N_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-21T00:50:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940268#M16923</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This was already done (without, I don't think it is even possible to run MPI application between 2 cards or host+Phi)...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:23:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940268#M16923</guid>
      <dc:creator>luckynew</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-21T08:23:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Eric,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940269#M16924</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Eric,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I ran the following&amp;nbsp;command:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;mpiexec.hydra -genv I_MPI_SSHM_SCIF 1 -n 2 -host mic0 /tmp/montecarlo.mic :&amp;nbsp; -n 3 -host mic1 /tmp/montecarlo.mic&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Where montecarlo.mic is the binary for&amp;nbsp;Phi. And it worked as expected.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If it still doesn't work for you, could you provide information about your Linux distribution version, the MPSS version (use the command "micinfo"), the Intel compiler version and the Intel MPL library version please.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 23:33:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940269#M16924</guid>
      <dc:creator>Loc_N_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-27T23:33:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello Loc-Nguyen,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940270#M16925</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Loc-Nguyen,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sorry about my late answer. I tried to sort out why it fails on my system but still have no clue. Instead of my industrial application, I tried with a simple example comparable to yours (montecarlo based computation of PI) and I reproduced the same problem. So, I think it is related to my &amp;nbsp;local installation. Please find below the answer to the questions you asked:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;[radioss@fradf-shady neon]$ mpiexec.hydra -genv I_MPI_SSHM_SCIF 0 -n 2 -host mic0 a.out.mic : -n 3 -host mic1 a.out.mic&lt;BR /&gt;MPI program results with 5 processes:&lt;BR /&gt;number of samples = 10000, seed = 10&lt;BR /&gt;estimated pi = 3.1000000000&lt;BR /&gt;difference between estimated pi and math.h M_PI = 0.0415926536&lt;BR /&gt;time to compute = 0 seconds&lt;BR /&gt;[radioss@fradf-shady neon]$ mpiexec.hydra -genv I_MPI_SSHM_SCIF 1 -n 2 -host mic0 a.out.mic : -n 3 -host mic1 a.out.mic&lt;BR /&gt;Fatal error in MPI_Init: Other MPI error, error stack:&lt;BR /&gt;MPIR_Init_thread(647)........................: &lt;BR /&gt;MPID_Init(192)...............................: channel initialization failed&lt;BR /&gt;MPIDI_CH3_Init(100)..........................: &lt;BR /&gt;MPID_nem_impi_shm_scif_connections_init(1877): &lt;BR /&gt;MPID_nem_impi_shm_scif_connect(2067).........: Internal MPI error! cannot perform connect&lt;BR /&gt;Fatal error in MPI_Init: Other MPI error, error stack:&lt;BR /&gt;MPIR_Init_thread(647)........................: &lt;BR /&gt;MPID_Init(192)...............................: channel initialization failed&lt;BR /&gt;MPIDI_CH3_Init(100)..........................: &lt;BR /&gt;MPID_nem_impi_shm_scif_connections_init(1864): &lt;BR /&gt;MPID_nem_impi_shm_scif_accept(1956)..........: Internal MPI error! cannot receive peer's rank&lt;BR /&gt;[radioss@fradf-shady neon]$ uname -a&lt;BR /&gt;Linux fradf-shady.europe.altair.com 2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Sep 1 01:33:01 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux[radioss@fradf-shady neon]$ ifort -V&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Intel(R) Fortran Intel(R) 64 Compiler XE for applications running on Intel(R) 64, Version 13.0.1.117 Build 20121010&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;[radioss@fradf-shady neon]$ which mpiexec.hydra&lt;BR /&gt;/opt/intel/impi/4.1.0.018/intel64/bin/mpiexec.hydra&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;[radioss@fradf-shady neon]$ sudo micinfo&lt;BR /&gt;[sudo] password for radioss: &lt;BR /&gt;sudo: micinfo: command not found&lt;BR /&gt;[radioss@fradf-shady neon]$ which micinfo&lt;BR /&gt;/opt/intel/mic/bin/micinfo&lt;BR /&gt;[radioss@fradf-shady neon]$ sudo /opt/intel/mic/bin/micinfo&lt;BR /&gt;MicInfo Utility Log&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Created Wed Mar 13 11:45:27 2013&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; System Info&lt;BR /&gt; Host OS : Linux&lt;BR /&gt; OS Version : 2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64&lt;BR /&gt; Driver Version : 4982-15&lt;BR /&gt; MPSS Version : 2.1.4982-15&lt;BR /&gt; Host Physical Memory : 24541 MB&lt;BR /&gt; CPU Family : GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 44 Stepping 2&lt;BR /&gt; CPU Speed : 1596.000&lt;BR /&gt; Threads per Core : 1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Device No: 0, Device Name: Intel(R) Xeon Phi(TM) Coprocessor&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Version&lt;BR /&gt; Flash Version : 2.1.05.0375&lt;BR /&gt; UOS Version : 2.6.38.8-g32944d0&lt;BR /&gt; Device Serial Number : ADKC22000357&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Board&lt;BR /&gt; Vendor ID : 8086&lt;BR /&gt; Device ID : 225c&lt;BR /&gt; SubSystem ID : 2500&lt;BR /&gt; Coprocessor Stepping ID : 1&lt;BR /&gt; PCIe Width : x16&lt;BR /&gt; PCIe Speed : 5 GT/s&lt;BR /&gt; PCIe Max payload size : 256 bytes&lt;BR /&gt; PCIe Max read req size : 512 bytes&lt;BR /&gt; Coprocessor Model : 0x01&lt;BR /&gt; Coprocessor Model Ext : 0x00&lt;BR /&gt; Coprocessor Type : 0x00&lt;BR /&gt; Coprocessor Family : 0x0b&lt;BR /&gt; Coprocessor Family Ext : 0x00&lt;BR /&gt; Coprocessor Stepping : B0&lt;BR /&gt; Board SKU : ES2-P1750&lt;BR /&gt; ECC Mode : Enabled&lt;BR /&gt; SMC HW Revision : Product 300W Active CS&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Core&lt;BR /&gt; Total No of Active Cores : 61&lt;BR /&gt; Voltage : 1021000 uV&lt;BR /&gt; Frequency : 1090909 kHz&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thermal&lt;BR /&gt; Fan Speed Control : On&lt;BR /&gt; SMC Firmware Version : 1.7.4172&lt;BR /&gt; FSC Strap : 14 MHz&lt;BR /&gt; Fan RPM : 2700&lt;BR /&gt; Fan PWM : 50&lt;BR /&gt; Die Temp : 62 C&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;GDDR&lt;BR /&gt; GDDR Vendor : Elpida&lt;BR /&gt; GDDR Version : 0x1&lt;BR /&gt; GDDR Density : 2048 Mb&lt;BR /&gt; GDDR Size : 7936 MB&lt;BR /&gt; GDDR Technology : GDDR5&lt;BR /&gt; GDDR Speed : 5.500000 GT/s&lt;BR /&gt; GDDR Frequency : 2750000 kHz&lt;BR /&gt; GDDR Voltage : 1000000 uV&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Device No: 1, Device Name: Intel(R) Xeon Phi(TM) Coprocessor&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Version&lt;BR /&gt; Flash Version : 2.1.05.0375&lt;BR /&gt; UOS Version : 2.6.38.8-g32944d0&lt;BR /&gt; Device Serial Number : ADKC22000339&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Board&lt;BR /&gt; Vendor ID : 8086&lt;BR /&gt; Device ID : 225c&lt;BR /&gt; SubSystem ID : 2500&lt;BR /&gt; Coprocessor Stepping ID : 1&lt;BR /&gt; PCIe Width : x16&lt;BR /&gt; PCIe Speed : 5 GT/s&lt;BR /&gt; PCIe Max payload size : 256 bytes&lt;BR /&gt; PCIe Max read req size : 512 bytes&lt;BR /&gt; Coprocessor Model : 0x01&lt;BR /&gt; Coprocessor Model Ext : 0x00&lt;BR /&gt; Coprocessor Type : 0x00&lt;BR /&gt; Coprocessor Family : 0x0b&lt;BR /&gt; Coprocessor Family Ext : 0x00&lt;BR /&gt; Coprocessor Stepping : B0&lt;BR /&gt; Board SKU : ES2-P1750&lt;BR /&gt; ECC Mode : Enabled&lt;BR /&gt; SMC HW Revision : Product 300W Active CS&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Core&lt;BR /&gt; Total No of Active Cores : 61&lt;BR /&gt; Voltage : 1047000 uV&lt;BR /&gt; Frequency : 1090909 kHz&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thermal&lt;BR /&gt; Fan Speed Control : On&lt;BR /&gt; SMC Firmware Version : 1.7.4172&lt;BR /&gt; FSC Strap : 14 MHz&lt;BR /&gt; Fan RPM : 2400&lt;BR /&gt; Fan PWM : 50&lt;BR /&gt; Die Temp : 58 C&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;GDDR&lt;BR /&gt; GDDR Vendor : Elpida&lt;BR /&gt; GDDR Version : 0x1&lt;BR /&gt; GDDR Density : 2048 Mb&lt;BR /&gt; GDDR Size : 7936 MB&lt;BR /&gt; GDDR Technology : GDDR5&lt;BR /&gt; GDDR Speed : 5.500000 GT/s&lt;BR /&gt; GDDR Frequency : 2750000 kHz&lt;BR /&gt; GDDR Voltage : 1000000 uV&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:53:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940270#M16925</guid>
      <dc:creator>luckynew</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-13T10:53:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello Eric,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940271#M16926</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Eric,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I just remember one more thing, would you like to verify the file /etc/modprobe.d/mic.conf to see if p2p enabled? If not, please set p2p=1 in that file and then reboot the system.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For your reference,here is what I&amp;nbsp;set in the file /etc/modprobe.d/mic.conf:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;options mic reg_cache=1 huge_page=1 watchdog=1 watchdog_auto_reboot=1 crash_dump=1 p2p=1 p2p_proxy=1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:47:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940271#M16926</guid>
      <dc:creator>Loc_N_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-14T00:47:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940272#M16927</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is was I already have:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;options mic reg_cache=1 huge_page=1 watchdog=1 watchdog_auto_reboot=1 crash_dump=1 p2p=1 p2p_proxy=1 pm_qos_cpu_dma_lat=75&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So, I think it is ok.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I still not understand why everything is working except this setting of &amp;nbsp;I_MPI_SSHM_SCIF 1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And I even do not know how it is important to enable it or not regarding performance...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for all your help,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Eric.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:53:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940272#M16927</guid>
      <dc:creator>luckynew</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-14T08:53:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Eric,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940273#M16928</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Eric,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Would you&amp;nbsp;like&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;set the environment variable I_MPI_FABRICS to "shm:tcp" and run your&amp;nbsp;program again please? Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; mpiexec.hydra -genv I_MPI_FABRICS shm:tcp -genv I_MPI_SSHM_SCIF 1 -n 2 -host mic a.out : -n 3 -host mic1 a.out&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:37:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940273#M16928</guid>
      <dc:creator>Loc_N_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-14T21:37:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Loc-Nguyen,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940274#M16929</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Loc-Nguyen,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I tried your modification, but I still encounter the same error.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Eric.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:48:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940274#M16929</guid>
      <dc:creator>luckynew</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-15T12:48:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Eric,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940275#M16930</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Eric,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You are using quite old Beta Intel(R) MPI Library 4.1.0.018. Now we have released Intel MPI Library.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please consider to upgrade to release version. It can be found at &lt;A href="https://registrationcenter.intel.com/RegCenter/Download.aspx?productid=1626"&gt;https://registrationcenter.intel.com/RegCenter/Download.aspx?productid=1626&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;---&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Dmitry&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 05:18:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940275#M16930</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dmitry_S_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-16T05:18:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Dmitry, Loc,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940276#M16931</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Dmitry, Loc,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You were right! I installed latest MPI 4.1.0.30 and now the issue with&amp;nbsp;I_MPI_SSHM_SCIF=1 has disapeared.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now, it works the same way with&amp;nbsp;I_MPI_SSHM_SCIF = 0 or 1.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Well, I haven't noticed any significant effect on performance to use 1 or 0.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The good news is that MPI 4.1.0.30 performs better than the old one in term of performance.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much for your help !&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Eric.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:49:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940276#M16931</guid>
      <dc:creator>luckynew</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-26T16:49:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Eric,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940277#M16932</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Eric,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I just learned that I_MPI_SSHM_SCIF is deprecated in Release version of IMPI 4.1.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:11:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Improving-MPI-performance-between-2-Xeon-Phi-cards/m-p/940277#M16932</guid>
      <dc:creator>Loc_N_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-26T17:11:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

