<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic LU factorization in Software Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/LU-factorization/m-p/740452#M203</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;has anyone implemented a LU factorization using cilk++. I would be interessted, &lt;BR /&gt;how well the algorithm scales for smaller matrices (dim &amp;lt;= 300).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks for any help&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 08:50:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cn_cologne</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-09-16T08:50:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LU factorization</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/LU-factorization/m-p/740452#M203</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;has anyone implemented a LU factorization using cilk++. I would be interessted, &lt;BR /&gt;how well the algorithm scales for smaller matrices (dim &amp;lt;= 300).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks for any help&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 08:50:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/LU-factorization/m-p/740452#M203</guid>
      <dc:creator>cn_cologne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-16T08:50:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

