<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Seeing Common Blocks in Software Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Seeing-Common-Blocks/m-p/960046#M21610</link>
    <description>OK, thanks Steve. It's likely that the development I'm working on won't be ready before August so if the upgrade's on time, everything will be dandy. In the mean time I'm OK because I can debug both sides - our project guys are getting the DLL workspace and they're likely to moan if they can see what's going on! ;o)</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2001 22:47:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Intel_C_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2001-07-26T22:47:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Seeing Common Blocks</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Seeing-Common-Blocks/m-p/960044#M21608</link>
      <description>My executable exports common blocks which my DLL imports. While debugging my DLL, using my executable as the 'Executable for debug seesion', I can use the IDE to 'Watch' local variables no problem. I can also  use 'Watch' to 'see' the STRUCTURE of my common blocks, but not the CONTENT. Is this a limitation I can't get around? Do I have to copy everything into a local variable if I want to see it? &lt;BR /&gt;Anybody any idea?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2001 21:32:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Seeing-Common-Blocks/m-p/960044#M21608</guid>
      <dc:creator>Intel_C_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-07-26T21:32:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Seeing Common Blocks</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Seeing-Common-Blocks/m-p/960045#M21609</link>
      <description>It's a bug, sorry.  Fixed in 6.6 (free upgrade for 6.5 users, coming in August.)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Steve</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2001 22:35:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Seeing-Common-Blocks/m-p/960045#M21609</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-07-26T22:35:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Seeing Common Blocks</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Seeing-Common-Blocks/m-p/960046#M21610</link>
      <description>OK, thanks Steve. It's likely that the development I'm working on won't be ready before August so if the upgrade's on time, everything will be dandy. In the mean time I'm OK because I can debug both sides - our project guys are getting the DLL workspace and they're likely to moan if they can see what's going on! ;o)</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2001 22:47:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Seeing-Common-Blocks/m-p/960046#M21610</guid>
      <dc:creator>Intel_C_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-07-26T22:47:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

