https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/sign-priority/m-p/964064#M22469 Here is a question from comp.lang.fortran (By corbett@lupa.eng.sun.com on 22 August 2001 3:57 PM). I think it is very interesting to see how it performs. I compiled this three-line program with CVF6.1a under win2k. It printed 64.000 (I expected -0.75!!) <BR /> <BR />PROGRAM MAIN <BR /> PRINT *, 2.0**-2*-3 <BR />END Thu, 23 Aug 2001 14:07:15 GMT Intel_C_Intel 2001-08-23T14:07:15Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/sign-priority/m-p/964064#M22469 Here is a question from comp.lang.fortran (By corbett@lupa.eng.sun.com on 22 August 2001 3:57 PM). I think it is very interesting to see how it performs. I compiled this three-line program with CVF6.1a under win2k. It printed 64.000 (I expected -0.75!!) <BR /> <BR />PROGRAM MAIN <BR /> PRINT *, 2.0**-2*-3 <BR />END Thu, 23 Aug 2001 14:07:15 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/sign-priority/m-p/964064#M22469 Intel_C_Intel 2001-08-23T14:07:15Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/sign-priority/m-p/964065#M22470 I saw the same posting. Read the <A href="http://www.compaq.com/fortran/docs/lrm/lrm0060.htm#numeric_expr" target="_blank">LRM section on Numeric Expressions</A>, especially the text under Examples.<BR /><BR />It is a bug that one doesn't get a standards warning for this - we'll fix that.<BR /><BR />Steve Thu, 23 Aug 2001 22:02:44 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/sign-priority/m-p/964065#M22470 Steven_L_Intel1 2001-08-23T22:02:44Z