<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: implicit conversions in Software Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/implicit-conversions/m-p/967579#M23252</link>
    <description>No - implicit conversions are part of the Fortran standard.  But we've had several requests for such a feature and might add it in the future as part of a set of user-settable rules.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You might look at something like the free FORCHEK tool, which can be very picky if you ask it to.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Steve</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2001 09:52:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2001-09-21T09:52:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>implicit conversions</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/implicit-conversions/m-p/967578#M23251</link>
      <description>Is there a way to get the compiler to warn you when an implicit conversion is taking place.  &lt;BR /&gt;  &lt;BR /&gt; I am in the process of modernizing a legacy code that stored many values in variables of the wrong type ( ints in reals for the most part), and would   &lt;BR /&gt;like the compiler to help as much as possible.  &lt;BR /&gt;for example:  &lt;BR /&gt;   INTEGER :: iVal   &lt;BR /&gt;   REAL :: rVal  &lt;BR /&gt;  &lt;BR /&gt;   rVal = 1         ! should be initialized with 1.0  &lt;BR /&gt;   iVal = rVal     ! should be INT(rVal)  &lt;BR /&gt;  &lt;BR /&gt;  rVal = REAL(iVal)  ! OK,  but why use this stmt...  &lt;BR /&gt;  &lt;BR /&gt;Thanks &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Russ Johns</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2001 06:33:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/implicit-conversions/m-p/967578#M23251</guid>
      <dc:creator>russell66</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-09-21T06:33:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: implicit conversions</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/implicit-conversions/m-p/967579#M23252</link>
      <description>No - implicit conversions are part of the Fortran standard.  But we've had several requests for such a feature and might add it in the future as part of a set of user-settable rules.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You might look at something like the free FORCHEK tool, which can be very picky if you ask it to.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Steve</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2001 09:52:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/implicit-conversions/m-p/967579#M23252</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-09-21T09:52:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

