<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Windows Pthreads in Software Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Windows-Pthreads/m-p/746846#M2372</link>
    <description>Boyd,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;IPI may be using the function signature for it's supported lock and unlock (e.g. that from TBB).&lt;BR /&gt;If you are not using TBB in your application, then try lifting its lock/unlock functions, extract the body of the function and replace it with the pthreads equivalent. Thus creating a lock/unlock function signature the same as for TBB (but performing your particular lock request).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Jim Dempsey</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 17:57:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jimdempseyatthecove</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-11-29T17:57:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Windows Pthreads</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Windows-Pthreads/m-p/746844#M2370</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I tried to use Intel Parallel Inspector (IPI) on Windows, but I am using pthreads and IPI does not know about pthreads on Windows and therefore gives a lot of warnings about potential data race conditions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way for me to inform IPI the lock and unlock functions of the pthreads library so IPI knows that proper lock/unlock is done so IPI will not give false warnings?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suppressed the warnings, but after suppressing hundreds of warnings, I am not confident that proper checking is being done (perhaps legitimate errors are being suppressed do to the requirement to suppress at such a low level).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:56:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Windows-Pthreads/m-p/746844#M2370</guid>
      <dc:creator>Boyd_Edmondson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-28T21:56:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Windows Pthreads</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Windows-Pthreads/m-p/746845#M2371</link>
      <description>Hello Boyd,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Pthreads on Windows are not supported. You may report a feature request in premier.intel.com.&lt;BR /&gt;How do you build your pthread application? What compiler do you use? GCC on Windows like Cygwin is unsupported configuration.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Kirill</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 09:10:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Windows-Pthreads/m-p/746845#M2371</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kirill_R_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-29T09:10:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Windows Pthreads</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Windows-Pthreads/m-p/746846#M2372</link>
      <description>Boyd,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;IPI may be using the function signature for it's supported lock and unlock (e.g. that from TBB).&lt;BR /&gt;If you are not using TBB in your application, then try lifting its lock/unlock functions, extract the body of the function and replace it with the pthreads equivalent. Thus creating a lock/unlock function signature the same as for TBB (but performing your particular lock request).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Jim Dempsey</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 17:57:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Windows-Pthreads/m-p/746846#M2372</guid>
      <dc:creator>jimdempseyatthecove</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-29T17:57:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Windows Pthreads</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Windows-Pthreads/m-p/746847#M2373</link>
      <description>Thank you for the clever suggestion.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have also submitted an example project to Intel to see if they might be able to provide support for Windows Pthreads.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:46:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Windows-Pthreads/m-p/746847#M2373</guid>
      <dc:creator>Boyd_Edmondson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-16T17:46:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

