<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Windows support for Xeon Phi™ in Software Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Which-compiler/m-p/971061#M23957</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Windows support for Xeon Phi™ is only available in the Beta packages at the URL you cited. That's the best/proper choice at this moment. The official Composer XE 2013 SP1 release with Windows support for Xeon Phi™ is targeted for early next month, so you can upgrade (assuming you have current product subscription - sounds like you do) to that release then.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I believe an MPSS Beta update release is also planned around the same time next month.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 15:18:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kevin_D_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-08-08T15:18:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Which compiler?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Which-compiler/m-p/971060#M23956</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've just received PHI 3120 on a Windows machine.&amp;nbsp; The code we've written is in the current Intel Fortran but I see the Intel web pages discuss an beta version of a Fortran compiler and Amplifier for the PHI.&amp;nbsp; I'm confused.&amp;nbsp; Should we be using the up-to-date current Intel Fortran compiler or the beta version discussed in &lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/beta-windows-enabled-drivers-and-development-tools-for-intelr-xeon-phitm-coprocessor" target="_blank"&gt;http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/beta-windows-enabled-drivers-and-development-tools-for-intelr-xeon-phitm-coprocessor&lt;/A&gt;?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I figure we're going to have enough fun being de facto hardware and software beta testers that we ight as well start with the best/proper choice of compiler.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Bruce&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 00:38:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Which-compiler/m-p/971060#M23956</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bruce_Weaver</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-08T00:38:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Windows support for Xeon Phi™</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Which-compiler/m-p/971061#M23957</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Windows support for Xeon Phi™ is only available in the Beta packages at the URL you cited. That's the best/proper choice at this moment. The official Composer XE 2013 SP1 release with Windows support for Xeon Phi™ is targeted for early next month, so you can upgrade (assuming you have current product subscription - sounds like you do) to that release then.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I believe an MPSS Beta update release is also planned around the same time next month.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 15:18:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Which-compiler/m-p/971061#M23957</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kevin_D_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-08T15:18:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

