<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NMAKE in Software Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/NMAKE/m-p/977250#M25296</link>
    <description>I would think that a static library (LIB) would be the way to go here.  I'm not a NMAKE expert (NMAKE is direct from Microsoft).  Any reason why you can't use a Developer Studio project instead?  It's MUCH easier than messing with makefiles!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Steve</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2001 11:52:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2001-12-13T11:52:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NMAKE</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/NMAKE/m-p/977249#M25295</link>
      <description>I am using Compaq Visual Fortran 6.1 on a PC with XP.  Trying to port a &lt;BR /&gt;suite of Engineering s/w I have been maintaining for a number of years &lt;BR /&gt;on an IBM RS/6000 with AIX.  I have a make file that sets OBJ equal to a &lt;BR /&gt;long list of *.o files.  Converting this to NMAKE on the PC, it &lt;BR /&gt;complains that I have too many names in this list.  What is the limit on &lt;BR /&gt;the number of names in such a list in NMAKE?  I have considered &lt;BR /&gt;work-arounds based on features of make or linkers on other systems, but &lt;BR /&gt;I haven't found info indicating that these features are available with &lt;BR /&gt;CVF 6.1 and NMAKE.  For instance there is an "r" option for the linker &lt;BR /&gt;on AIX that produces a partial link file, and one can presumably do a &lt;BR /&gt;number of these with subsets of the code and then do a final link, &lt;BR /&gt;linking all these together. &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Alternatively one could turn to archive (library) files.  The 1993 &lt;BR /&gt;version of the Make book by O'Reilly describes a notation of the form &lt;BR /&gt;libx(file.o)   that can be used as a prerequisite to mean that Make &lt;BR /&gt;should check the date on the file "file.o" in the library "libx". &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Are any of these ideas workable with NMAKE, or is there a better &lt;BR /&gt;approach? &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for any suggestions.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2001 11:19:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/NMAKE/m-p/977249#M25295</guid>
      <dc:creator>Intel_C_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-12-13T11:19:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NMAKE</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/NMAKE/m-p/977250#M25296</link>
      <description>I would think that a static library (LIB) would be the way to go here.  I'm not a NMAKE expert (NMAKE is direct from Microsoft).  Any reason why you can't use a Developer Studio project instead?  It's MUCH easier than messing with makefiles!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Steve</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2001 11:52:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/NMAKE/m-p/977250#M25296</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-12-13T11:52:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NMAKE</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/NMAKE/m-p/977251#M25297</link>
      <description>To Steve from Chuck, &lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for the reply.  What's easy and what's hard depends on where you are coming from and what your objective is.  I have been maintaining this code for years with MAKE in Unix systems, and expect to continue doing that.  Porting the code to the PC Windows environment will be a parallel development track, and I would like to keep it as similar to the Unix track as possible.  I want to be diverted as little as possible by concerns that are unique to the Wintel environment -- thus I would like to avoid having to invest time in becoming familiar with the Developer environment.  It would be most convenient for me if I could find as way of using MAKE in Unix and NMAKE in Wintel that would be essentially the same.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2001 16:08:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/NMAKE/m-p/977251#M25297</guid>
      <dc:creator>Intel_C_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-12-13T16:08:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NMAKE</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/NMAKE/m-p/977252#M25298</link>
      <description>Have you tried looking for a copy of gmake (GNU make) that works on Windows?  I'm pretty sure there is one. Microsoft's NMAKE isn't completely compatible with UNIX make.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Steve</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 03:33:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/NMAKE/m-p/977252#M25298</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-12-14T03:33:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

