<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Error:no matching specific function for this generic functi in Software Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Error-no-matching-specific-function-for-this-generic-function/m-p/982355#M26367</link>
    <description>In creating a small sample project to reproduce the error, I discovered the behavior that we experienced was due to some sloppy coding that was "allowed" in the past. Consider the following call to GetProcAddress:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  &lt;BR /&gt;lpget_xyz=GetProcAddress(hlib,'GET_XYZ'C)&lt;BR /&gt;If hlib is not explicitly declared as INTEGER, the error will occur.&lt;BR /&gt;Bill</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2002 04:07:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bdrichards</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-02-04T04:07:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Error:no matching specific function for this generic function</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Error-no-matching-specific-function-for-this-generic-function/m-p/982353#M26365</link>
      <description>After upgrading to 6.6 and now attempting to BUILD an existing project we receive this error:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Error: There is no matching specific function for this generic function reference.   [GETPROCADDRESS]   &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; This error occurs when we "USE" DFWIN or DFWINTY. Why should we receive this error (and especially with no changes other than the upgrade)?</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2002 13:30:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Error-no-matching-specific-function-for-this-generic-function/m-p/982353#M26365</guid>
      <dc:creator>bdrichards</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-02-02T13:30:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Error:no matching specific function for this generic functi</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Error-no-matching-specific-function-for-this-generic-function/m-p/982354#M26366</link>
      <description>6.6 includes a complete retranslation of the Win32 API declarations.  Without seeing your code, I can't say what is wrong - please send a short but complete example demonstrating the problem to vf-support@compaq.com and we'll take a look. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Steve</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2002 00:25:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Error-no-matching-specific-function-for-this-generic-function/m-p/982354#M26366</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-02-03T00:25:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Error:no matching specific function for this generic functi</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Error-no-matching-specific-function-for-this-generic-function/m-p/982355#M26367</link>
      <description>In creating a small sample project to reproduce the error, I discovered the behavior that we experienced was due to some sloppy coding that was "allowed" in the past. Consider the following call to GetProcAddress:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  &lt;BR /&gt;lpget_xyz=GetProcAddress(hlib,'GET_XYZ'C)&lt;BR /&gt;If hlib is not explicitly declared as INTEGER, the error will occur.&lt;BR /&gt;Bill</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2002 04:07:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Error-no-matching-specific-function-for-this-generic-function/m-p/982355#M26367</guid>
      <dc:creator>bdrichards</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-02-04T04:07:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Error:no matching specific function for this generic functi</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Error-no-matching-specific-function-for-this-generic-function/m-p/982356#M26368</link>
      <description>BTW, this is a debugging technique that I use a lot.  After a certain amount of examination of the code, I conclude that it's a compiler error and try to reproduce it with a small test program.  I do find a certain amount of compiler errors this way but also it puts me in a mindset that absolutely anything could be happening in my code instead of retaining my prejudices about what the code should do.  Often this is just the attitude I need to run errors in my code to ground.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2002 05:54:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Error-no-matching-specific-function-for-this-generic-function/m-p/982356#M26368</guid>
      <dc:creator>Intel_C_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-02-04T05:54:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

