<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: assert in Software Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/assert/m-p/986431#M27230</link>
    <description>No.  It's easy enough to write your own.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Steve</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2002 02:26:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-03-19T02:26:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>assert</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/assert/m-p/986430#M27229</link>
      <description>Does Fortran or Visual Fortran have an equivalent for C language's  &lt;BR /&gt;"assert" to catch programmatic errors?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2002 02:05:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/assert/m-p/986430#M27229</guid>
      <dc:creator>intelgg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-03-19T02:05:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: assert</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/assert/m-p/986431#M27230</link>
      <description>No.  It's easy enough to write your own.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Steve</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2002 02:26:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/assert/m-p/986431#M27230</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-03-19T02:26:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

