<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic FLEXlm license issues with --dumpversion in Software Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/FLEXlm-license-issues-with-dumpversion/m-p/750545#M3528</link>
    <description>Hi. I have a slightly frustrating problem, and I'm hoping that someone here might be able to provide me a solution. I have a multi-license copy of icc system on my network, and a license server so multiple people can build at once. This works exactly as expected (and properly).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However, I have a specific machine that's isolated from much of the network - specifically it cannot connect to the license server. I'm trying to run some builds/test on it with tools other than icc, but for some (frustrating) reasons, our build system (bjam) needs to stat/check the version of all of the compilers around. The machine in question has all the icc binaries, but grinds to a halt on the version checks. Specifically, it's trying to run:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;icc -dumpversion&lt;BR /&gt;icc -dumpmachine&lt;BR /&gt;icc -print-prog-name=xiar&lt;BR /&gt;icc -print-prog-name=ranlib&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All of which seem innocuous enough that they should be runnable without a connection to the license server, but instead hang for ~50 seconds before spitting out "Error: A license for CCompL is not available now (-15,570,115).", along with some more messages about the license server.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So my question is as follows: is there some easy way to get icc run these more simply? It seems like I shouldn't need a license server (or even internet connection) to check the version of a binary. I suppose I could do some kind of hack and wrap the binary in a shell-script to check for those arguments, but that seems pretty clunky for a version check. Ideas? Suggestions?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Much obliged!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:02:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bsteintrc</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-11-15T20:02:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FLEXlm license issues with --dumpversion</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/FLEXlm-license-issues-with-dumpversion/m-p/750545#M3528</link>
      <description>Hi. I have a slightly frustrating problem, and I'm hoping that someone here might be able to provide me a solution. I have a multi-license copy of icc system on my network, and a license server so multiple people can build at once. This works exactly as expected (and properly).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However, I have a specific machine that's isolated from much of the network - specifically it cannot connect to the license server. I'm trying to run some builds/test on it with tools other than icc, but for some (frustrating) reasons, our build system (bjam) needs to stat/check the version of all of the compilers around. The machine in question has all the icc binaries, but grinds to a halt on the version checks. Specifically, it's trying to run:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;icc -dumpversion&lt;BR /&gt;icc -dumpmachine&lt;BR /&gt;icc -print-prog-name=xiar&lt;BR /&gt;icc -print-prog-name=ranlib&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All of which seem innocuous enough that they should be runnable without a connection to the license server, but instead hang for ~50 seconds before spitting out "Error: A license for CCompL is not available now (-15,570,115).", along with some more messages about the license server.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So my question is as follows: is there some easy way to get icc run these more simply? It seems like I shouldn't need a license server (or even internet connection) to check the version of a binary. I suppose I could do some kind of hack and wrap the binary in a shell-script to check for those arguments, but that seems pretty clunky for a version check. Ideas? Suggestions?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Much obliged!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:02:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/FLEXlm-license-issues-with-dumpversion/m-p/750545#M3528</guid>
      <dc:creator>bsteintrc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-15T20:02:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

