<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic If I may put my two cents in, in Software Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Poses/m-p/1028661#M41124</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If I may put my two cents in, d&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em; line-height: 1.5;"&gt;on't you think this would result in a more restrict set of actions? I think they are different (poses and gestures).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;A pose example: a game where posing a "big five" creates a "shield" as long as the "big five" is hold.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;A gesture could be swinging my hand to use my sword.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I know I can reproduce the pose behavior tracking all fingers state (I'm already doing that), and I know you probably have good arguments to merge them both, but I still think that it would be more intuitive to have poses (a state) and gestures (an action) separated.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 19:29:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AndreCarlucci</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-10-27T19:29:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Poses</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Poses/m-p/1028657#M41120</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em; line-height: 1.5;"&gt;Reading the docs, I see that you don't have "poses" anymore, just Gestures.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;That way, we won't have the event that the pose is not "active" anymore.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Is this the way it's going to be for the 1.0 version of the SDK?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2014 21:38:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Poses/m-p/1028657#M41120</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndreCarlucci</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-19T21:38:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>We do support poses(such as V</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Poses/m-p/1028658#M41121</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We do support poses(such as V-sign, spread finger, etc). What kinds pose do you want? Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:54:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Poses/m-p/1028658#M41121</guid>
      <dc:creator>Xusheng_L_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-24T15:54:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi David,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Poses/m-p/1028659#M41122</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi David,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The perceptual sdk has 2 different things:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;- poses: start event, end event&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;- gestures: on event&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The realsense sdk has only one model: on event&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Is this the way it's going to be to all gestures/poses?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:49:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Poses/m-p/1028659#M41122</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndreCarlucci</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-24T16:49:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yes, RealSense SDK combines</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Poses/m-p/1028660#M41123</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, RealSense SDK combines gestures and poses together and all called gestures.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 19:15:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Poses/m-p/1028660#M41123</guid>
      <dc:creator>Xusheng_L_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-27T19:15:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If I may put my two cents in,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Poses/m-p/1028661#M41124</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If I may put my two cents in, d&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em; line-height: 1.5;"&gt;on't you think this would result in a more restrict set of actions? I think they are different (poses and gestures).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;A pose example: a game where posing a "big five" creates a "shield" as long as the "big five" is hold.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;A gesture could be swinging my hand to use my sword.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I know I can reproduce the pose behavior tracking all fingers state (I'm already doing that), and I know you probably have good arguments to merge them both, but I still think that it would be more intuitive to have poses (a state) and gestures (an action) separated.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 19:29:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Poses/m-p/1028661#M41124</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndreCarlucci</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-27T19:29:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Very good question. If you</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Poses/m-p/1028662#M41125</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Very good question. If you look at the GestureData&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE class="brush:cpp;"&gt;	struct GestureData 
	{
		pxcI64				timeStamp;					/// Time-stamp in which the gesture occurred
		pxcUID				handId;	    				/// ID of the relevant tracked hand, if relevant and known
		GestureStateType	state;						/// The state of the gesture			
		pxcI32				frameNumber;				/// The number of the frame in which the gesture occurred			
		pxcCHAR				name[MAX_NAME_SIZE];		/// Unique name of this gesture 		
	};&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;You can use state to track the gesture. The state can be following.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;PRE class="brush:cpp;"&gt;enum GestureStateType {
		/// Gesture started
		GESTURE_STATE_START=0			 
		, GESTURE_STATE_IN_PROGRESS	/// Gesture is in progress
		, GESTURE_STATE_END			/// Gesture ended
	};&lt;/PRE&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Hope this will answer your question. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 19:58:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Poses/m-p/1028662#M41125</guid>
      <dc:creator>Xusheng_L_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-27T19:58:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Great!</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Poses/m-p/1028663#M41126</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Great!&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;So gestures like swipe left will have only&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Consolas, 'Bitstream Vera Sans Mono', 'Courier New', Courier, monospace; line-height: 14.3088006973267px;"&gt;GESTURE_STATE_START or&amp;nbsp;GESTURE_STATE_END?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 20:09:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Poses/m-p/1028663#M41126</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndreCarlucci</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-27T20:09:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yes, and you can use those</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Poses/m-p/1028664#M41127</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, and you can use those two states in your call back event.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 21:23:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Poses/m-p/1028664#M41127</guid>
      <dc:creator>Xusheng_L_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-27T21:23:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Andre,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Poses/m-p/1028665#M41128</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Andre,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;In addition to David's comment, please note that when you enable gestures detection in the SDK, you have a flag that indicates if you want to receive only start/stop events, or get an event at every frame where the gesture is detected.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Indeed for moving gestures this doesn't make much of a difference, but for poses it can be useful&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Dagan&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2014 22:16:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Poses/m-p/1028665#M41128</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dagan_E_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-03T22:16:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks David and Dagan :)</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Poses/m-p/1028666#M41129</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks David and Dagan :)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:36:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Poses/m-p/1028666#M41129</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndreCarlucci</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-17T17:36:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

