<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Intel Phi affinity with openMP in Software Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Intel-Phi-affinity-with-openMP/m-p/1044824#M47451</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I am testing the Intel Phi affinity with openMP. Please explain what is the default openMP affinity on Intel Phi. That is when &lt;STRONG&gt;#pragma omp parallel proc_bind(xxx)&lt;/STRONG&gt; is not specifying.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The following figure shows the time spent by an algorithm when &lt;STRONG&gt;spread, close and default&lt;/STRONG&gt; affinities are set. The program runs in offload mode.&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="affinity.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.intel.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/7506i15ED7C2330A7677F/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999&amp;amp;whitelist-exif-data=Orientation%2CResolution%2COriginalDefaultFinalSize%2CCopyright" role="button" title="affinity.jpg" alt="affinity.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I noticed the default affinity is better than spread or close. Why?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 04:29:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mahendra_S_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-04-28T04:29:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Intel Phi affinity with openMP</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Intel-Phi-affinity-with-openMP/m-p/1044824#M47451</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I am testing the Intel Phi affinity with openMP. Please explain what is the default openMP affinity on Intel Phi. That is when &lt;STRONG&gt;#pragma omp parallel proc_bind(xxx)&lt;/STRONG&gt; is not specifying.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The following figure shows the time spent by an algorithm when &lt;STRONG&gt;spread, close and default&lt;/STRONG&gt; affinities are set. The program runs in offload mode.&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="affinity.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.intel.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/7506i15ED7C2330A7677F/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999&amp;amp;whitelist-exif-data=Orientation%2CResolution%2COriginalDefaultFinalSize%2CCopyright" role="button" title="affinity.jpg" alt="affinity.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I noticed the default affinity is better than spread or close. Why?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 04:29:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Intel-Phi-affinity-with-openMP/m-p/1044824#M47451</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mahendra_S_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-28T04:29:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

