<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic very poor performance using ELK DFT code in Software Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/very-poor-performance-using-ELK-DFT-code/m-p/1059025#M53241</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear all,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I've succeeded in compiling the DFT code named ELK ( &lt;A href="http://elk.sourceforge.net/"&gt;http://elk.sourceforge.net/&lt;/A&gt; ) for the intel phi coprocessor, in native mode, but the tests show a very poor performance.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I've used the flags -mkl -mmic after sourcing the compilevars.sh as shown below:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------begin of make.inc file&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;MAKE = make&lt;BR /&gt;
	F90 = ifort&lt;BR /&gt;
	F90_OPTS = -O2 -ip -unroll -no-prec-div -openmp -mmic -L&amp;nbsp; /opt/intel/lib/mic&lt;BR /&gt;
	F77 = ifort&lt;BR /&gt;
	F77_OPTS = -O2 -ip -unroll -no-prec-div -openmp -mmic -L&amp;nbsp; /opt/intel/lib/mic&lt;BR /&gt;
	&lt;BR /&gt;
	AR = ar&lt;BR /&gt;
	&lt;BR /&gt;
	LIB_SYS =&lt;BR /&gt;
	# LAPACK and BLAS libraries&lt;BR /&gt;
	LIB_LPK = -mkl -openmp -mmic&lt;BR /&gt;
	&lt;BR /&gt;
	LIB_FFT = fftlib.a&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;--------------------------end of make.inc file&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I hope somebody could help me before I turn on the waterworks...&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;TIA,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; Carb.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2015 07:53:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Carbunco_F_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-01-24T07:53:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>very poor performance using ELK DFT code</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/very-poor-performance-using-ELK-DFT-code/m-p/1059025#M53241</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear all,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I've succeeded in compiling the DFT code named ELK ( &lt;A href="http://elk.sourceforge.net/"&gt;http://elk.sourceforge.net/&lt;/A&gt; ) for the intel phi coprocessor, in native mode, but the tests show a very poor performance.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I've used the flags -mkl -mmic after sourcing the compilevars.sh as shown below:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------begin of make.inc file&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;MAKE = make&lt;BR /&gt;
	F90 = ifort&lt;BR /&gt;
	F90_OPTS = -O2 -ip -unroll -no-prec-div -openmp -mmic -L&amp;nbsp; /opt/intel/lib/mic&lt;BR /&gt;
	F77 = ifort&lt;BR /&gt;
	F77_OPTS = -O2 -ip -unroll -no-prec-div -openmp -mmic -L&amp;nbsp; /opt/intel/lib/mic&lt;BR /&gt;
	&lt;BR /&gt;
	AR = ar&lt;BR /&gt;
	&lt;BR /&gt;
	LIB_SYS =&lt;BR /&gt;
	# LAPACK and BLAS libraries&lt;BR /&gt;
	LIB_LPK = -mkl -openmp -mmic&lt;BR /&gt;
	&lt;BR /&gt;
	LIB_FFT = fftlib.a&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;--------------------------end of make.inc file&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I hope somebody could help me before I turn on the waterworks...&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;TIA,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; Carb.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2015 07:53:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/very-poor-performance-using-ELK-DFT-code/m-p/1059025#M53241</guid>
      <dc:creator>Carbunco_F_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-24T07:53:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello Carbunco,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/very-poor-performance-using-ELK-DFT-code/m-p/1059026#M53242</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Carbunco,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Can you please provide us some of the benchmark results you have got and details about what are you comparing your results with. It would great if you can provide us some of your initial profiling results which will help us find out which routines(where you expect better performance) to investigate further.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Also it would be helpful if you can provide us with the list of changes &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.0080003738403px; line-height: 19.5120010375977px;"&gt;you made&lt;/SPAN&gt;(or the modified code) in order to get the code compiling &amp;nbsp;and running on Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessors.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:16:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/very-poor-performance-using-ELK-DFT-code/m-p/1059026#M53242</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sunny_G_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-26T18:16:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

