<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Nehalem always implies EPT support? in Software Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Nehalem-always-implies-EPT-support/m-p/802923#M5643</link>
    <description>Hey David,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Do you know if the Cisco UCS B200 M2 supports EPT? If so does simply enabling VT-x turn on EPT?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Aaron</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:24:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>aaronk76</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-10-12T15:24:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Nehalem always implies EPT support?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Nehalem-always-implies-EPT-support/m-p/802920#M5640</link>
      <description>While I read in another thread (&lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/showthread.php?t=63086"&gt;http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/showthread.php?t=63086&lt;/A&gt;) that Nehalem desktop CPUs may have extended page table (EPT) support as part of their virtualization capabilities, it wasn't clear to me from this post whether all Nehalem-based CPUs will have EPT. Will they? For example, will all Nehalem-based Xeons have EPT? If not, is there a list of exactly which processors (if there are any that are not Nehalem-based I would be interested in knowing anyway) support EPT? I have only found a list (&lt;A href="http://ark.intel.com/VTList.aspx"&gt;http://ark.intel.com/VTList.aspx&lt;/A&gt;) of which support virtualization overall.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 18:06:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Nehalem-always-implies-EPT-support/m-p/802920#M5640</guid>
      <dc:creator>amdunn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-08T18:06:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nehalem always implies EPT support?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Nehalem-always-implies-EPT-support/m-p/802921#M5641</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I was told that EPT is part of the Nehalem core design. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If theNehalem product offering supports VT-x (CPU virtualization), then EPT is supported.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;David Ott&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:57:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Nehalem-always-implies-EPT-support/m-p/802921#M5641</guid>
      <dc:creator>David_O_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-15T18:57:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nehalem always implies EPT support?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Nehalem-always-implies-EPT-support/m-p/802922#M5642</link>
      <description>Also note that the platform OEM must provide BIOS supportfor turning the feature on. I was told that most OEMs are doing that now, but this caveat should be mentioned. Try checking the OEM's BIOS documentation for the platform to verify.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;David Ott</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:18:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Nehalem-always-implies-EPT-support/m-p/802922#M5642</guid>
      <dc:creator>David_O_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-16T00:18:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nehalem always implies EPT support?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Nehalem-always-implies-EPT-support/m-p/802923#M5643</link>
      <description>Hey David,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Do you know if the Cisco UCS B200 M2 supports EPT? If so does simply enabling VT-x turn on EPT?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Aaron</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:24:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Nehalem-always-implies-EPT-support/m-p/802923#M5643</guid>
      <dc:creator>aaronk76</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-12T15:24:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nehalem always implies EPT support?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Nehalem-always-implies-EPT-support/m-p/802924#M5644</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Have asked internally about this. Stay tuned.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;David Ott&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:42:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Nehalem-always-implies-EPT-support/m-p/802924#M5644</guid>
      <dc:creator>David_O_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-21T15:42:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nehalem always implies EPT support?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Nehalem-always-implies-EPT-support/m-p/802925#M5645</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The online Cisco product literature I have seenon UCS B200 M2 indicates that the product uses Xeon 5600 processors. EPTissupported in this processor line. Yes, look for an Intel VT enable option in the BIOS.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;David Ott&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:09:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Nehalem-always-implies-EPT-support/m-p/802925#M5645</guid>
      <dc:creator>David_O_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-21T20:09:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

