<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Cilkscreen/Cilkview needs to be released as 64 bit binary (Linux) in Software Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Cilkscreen-Cilkview-needs-to-be-released-as-64-bit-binary-Linux/m-p/1068513#M57223</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, many modern 64 bit clusters do not provide 32 bit libraries. The cilkscreen/cilkview tools appear to be compiled as 32 bit applications and so error when running on a cluster without 32 bit libraries:&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 13px; -webkit-text-stroke: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;/lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Helvetica"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13px; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;Can you please release both 32 bit and 64 bit binaries for cilk screen and cilk view? This seems like negligible effort on your part for a huge benefit to your users.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Stephen&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;STYLE type="text/css"&gt;p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 13.0px Helvetica; -webkit-text-stroke: #000000}
span.s1 {font-kerning: none}
&lt;/STYLE&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 19:11:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Stephen_B_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-01-12T19:11:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cilkscreen/Cilkview needs to be released as 64 bit binary (Linux)</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Cilkscreen-Cilkview-needs-to-be-released-as-64-bit-binary-Linux/m-p/1068513#M57223</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, many modern 64 bit clusters do not provide 32 bit libraries. The cilkscreen/cilkview tools appear to be compiled as 32 bit applications and so error when running on a cluster without 32 bit libraries:&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 13px; -webkit-text-stroke: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;/lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Helvetica"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13px; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;Can you please release both 32 bit and 64 bit binaries for cilk screen and cilk view? This seems like negligible effort on your part for a huge benefit to your users.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Stephen&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;STYLE type="text/css"&gt;p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 13.0px Helvetica; -webkit-text-stroke: #000000}
span.s1 {font-kerning: none}
&lt;/STYLE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 19:11:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Cilkscreen-Cilkview-needs-to-be-released-as-64-bit-binary-Linux/m-p/1068513#M57223</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen_B_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-12T19:11:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yes, we can release both 32</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Cilkscreen-Cilkview-needs-to-be-released-as-64-bit-binary-Linux/m-p/1068514#M57224</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, we can release both 32 and 64 bit binaries if it can improve user experience.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 22:42:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Cilkscreen-Cilkview-needs-to-be-released-as-64-bit-binary-Linux/m-p/1068514#M57224</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hansang_B_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-13T22:42:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>That would be a great help</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Cilkscreen-Cilkview-needs-to-be-released-as-64-bit-binary-Linux/m-p/1068515#M57225</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That would be a great help since currently our students are using cilk from 2008 which was released as source before the company was bought by intel.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I have not seen the 64 bit version uploaded to&amp;nbsp;https://www.cilkplus.org/download yet. Any idea when we can expect the upload?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Stephen&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 15:27:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Cilkscreen-Cilkview-needs-to-be-released-as-64-bit-binary-Linux/m-p/1068515#M57225</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen_B_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-18T15:27:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Cilk tools package with</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Cilkscreen-Cilkview-needs-to-be-released-as-64-bit-binary-Linux/m-p/1068516#M57226</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;New Cilk tools package with 64-bit driver binaries is now available at &lt;A href="https://www.cilkplus.org/download" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cilkplus.org/download&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2017 19:11:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Cilkscreen-Cilkview-needs-to-be-released-as-64-bit-binary-Linux/m-p/1068516#M57226</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hansang_B_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-23T19:11:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

