<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Quote:PUBUDU S. (Intel) wrote in Software Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/R200-pixel-size/m-p/1072466#M58683</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;PUBUDU S. (Intel) wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;It depends on the resolution of your stream and the distance of the object from the camera&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Not really, as the pixel size is a physical measurement of the actual sensor element.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;If you change the resolution of the stream, this usually just means that you are changing the number of pixels used from the sensor. Unless you interpolate data to create a larger image, which I don't think is the case here.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The distance of the objects is totally irrelevant to the size of the pixels.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Basically, if you know the sensor size you can just divide it by the maximum native resolution, and that should give you an estimated pixel size.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:24:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>samontab</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-07-29T00:24:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>R200 pixel size</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/R200-pixel-size/m-p/1072464#M58681</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Anyone could know the pixel size of R200 IR camera. 5.6um or 4um &amp;nbsp;?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 19:11:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/R200-pixel-size/m-p/1072464#M58681</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jerry_L_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-26T19:11:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>It depends on the resolution</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/R200-pixel-size/m-p/1072465#M58682</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It depends on the resolution of your stream and the distance of the object from the camera&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:29:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/R200-pixel-size/m-p/1072465#M58682</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pubudu-Silva_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-28T17:29:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Quote:PUBUDU S. (Intel) wrote</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/R200-pixel-size/m-p/1072466#M58683</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;PUBUDU S. (Intel) wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;It depends on the resolution of your stream and the distance of the object from the camera&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Not really, as the pixel size is a physical measurement of the actual sensor element.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;If you change the resolution of the stream, this usually just means that you are changing the number of pixels used from the sensor. Unless you interpolate data to create a larger image, which I don't think is the case here.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The distance of the objects is totally irrelevant to the size of the pixels.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Basically, if you know the sensor size you can just divide it by the maximum native resolution, and that should give you an estimated pixel size.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:24:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/R200-pixel-size/m-p/1072466#M58683</guid>
      <dc:creator>samontab</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-29T00:24:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

