<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic So let me understand what you in Software Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Face-Recognition-Security/m-p/1080055#M61239</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;So let me understand what you think is the right process here:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Get a recognition result (which may be a false positive - so you need to implicitly treat each result as a false positive) and then compare your live face data with another database with depth information to potentially verify it?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;You really think that is secure or even in the slightest bit performant? The answer is no.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;This is another case of the SDK functionality not really being fit for purpose.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;@Intel: Are you going to address these issues?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:23:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Brennon_W_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-11-23T15:23:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Face Recognition Security</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Face-Recognition-Security/m-p/1080053#M61237</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Was just noticing the other day, a particular problem.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;If I have a user registered in my solution, it appears that I can take a photo of that user and get a positive recognition as well.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;That is a pretty major security concern.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I originally thought using the depth camera would take values from the depth of the face as well, making a photo impossible to use.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Is there a&amp;nbsp;property or method&amp;nbsp;that I have missed somewhere which will make this secure?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:01:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Face-Recognition-Security/m-p/1080053#M61237</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brennon_W_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-11-23T14:01:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>You can add your own extra</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Face-Recognition-Security/m-p/1080054#M61238</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You can add your own extra layers of security, for example checking actual face dimensions, or even check slight movements over time.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:11:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Face-Recognition-Security/m-p/1080054#M61238</guid>
      <dc:creator>samontab</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-11-23T15:11:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>So let me understand what you</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Face-Recognition-Security/m-p/1080055#M61239</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So let me understand what you think is the right process here:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Get a recognition result (which may be a false positive - so you need to implicitly treat each result as a false positive) and then compare your live face data with another database with depth information to potentially verify it?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;You really think that is secure or even in the slightest bit performant? The answer is no.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;This is another case of the SDK functionality not really being fit for purpose.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;@Intel: Are you going to address these issues?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:23:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Face-Recognition-Security/m-p/1080055#M61239</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brennon_W_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-11-23T15:23:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BTW Samontab, really like</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Face-Recognition-Security/m-p/1080056#M61240</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;BTW Samontab, really like your blog. Some great stuff on there.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:26:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Face-Recognition-Security/m-p/1080056#M61240</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brennon_W_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-11-23T15:26:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks Brennon!
	 </title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Face-Recognition-Security/m-p/1080057#M61241</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Brennon!&lt;BR /&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 23:40:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Face-Recognition-Security/m-p/1080057#M61241</guid>
      <dc:creator>samontab</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-11-24T23:40:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

