<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Q57 Chipset and XEN in Software Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Q57-Chipset-and-XEN/m-p/836869#M6330</link>
    <description>Q57 and i5/i7 are client platforms. They do have the basic support for virtualization (VT-x, aka CPU Virtualization), but is really intended for "light" use, such asone or two VMs with a single user type usage.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Depending on your needs, you might want to consider a Xeon based server platform. The recent chipsets have VT-D features (for I/O virtualization), and the processorsinclude the second generation of VT-x which includes additional support for memory virtualization and additional enhancments. The low end Xeons overlap the high end desktops in terms of cost.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The key question really is about your requirements and the intended purpose and throughput/utilization of the server.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As for Xen, it is highly optimized to work with the Intel VT features and I know plenty of people are spending a lot of time adding optimizations and features.. If you end up with a Xeon class machine, you might even adventure into the latest Xen (unstable beta for example) to get additional optimizations.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:24:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Hussam_Mousa__Intel_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-08-19T15:24:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Q57 Chipset and XEN</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Q57-Chipset-and-XEN/m-p/836868#M6329</link>
      <description>Hello @ all,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i like to build a server for virtualization. I would like to buy a Intel Mainbord with a Q57-Chipset to realize this, but i dont find enough information about this combo of Q57-chipset, Core i5 / i7 CPU and XEN. Can someone help me out with more info, or know exactly if this will work well with XEN?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Tanks a lot&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Greetings</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:17:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Q57-Chipset-and-XEN/m-p/836868#M6329</guid>
      <dc:creator>cocolocko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-17T21:17:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Q57 Chipset and XEN</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Q57-Chipset-and-XEN/m-p/836869#M6330</link>
      <description>Q57 and i5/i7 are client platforms. They do have the basic support for virtualization (VT-x, aka CPU Virtualization), but is really intended for "light" use, such asone or two VMs with a single user type usage.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Depending on your needs, you might want to consider a Xeon based server platform. The recent chipsets have VT-D features (for I/O virtualization), and the processorsinclude the second generation of VT-x which includes additional support for memory virtualization and additional enhancments. The low end Xeons overlap the high end desktops in terms of cost.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The key question really is about your requirements and the intended purpose and throughput/utilization of the server.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As for Xen, it is highly optimized to work with the Intel VT features and I know plenty of people are spending a lot of time adding optimizations and features.. If you end up with a Xeon class machine, you might even adventure into the latest Xen (unstable beta for example) to get additional optimizations.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:24:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Q57-Chipset-and-XEN/m-p/836869#M6330</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hussam_Mousa__Intel_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-19T15:24:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

