<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Thanks for the feedback. In in Software Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Simple-feature-request/m-p/1149788#M78583</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the feedback. In fact, those date-stamped config.xml files are named like that to avoid confusion with the config.xml file that is being generated. They only appear if you have a config.xml file in the root of the project folder when you run the export tool. I know that if you do not complete the process (e.g., start the export but do not save the ZIP) the export tool can leave a config.xml file behind, in the project folder. If you follow through and the process does not fail, you should not see these time-stamped config.xml files. This is just a very long way of saying that those time-stamped files are an artifact, not a feature, to insure we do not wipe out anything that you may already have in your project folder. We are not trying to manage those files.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 19:30:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PaulF_IntelCorp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-07-18T19:30:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Simple feature request</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Simple-feature-request/m-p/1149787#M78582</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Every time I create the Cordova build package I get a zip file called [appname]-pgb-cli-2017-0718-20117.zip. Looks ok, but I have a request: Could the time at the end of the filename please be formatted with leading zero's (always 6 digits), so the files will be displayed in the right order?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;When you are creating several build packages in a short time (like I do sometimes) this would really make a difference. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 18:08:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Simple-feature-request/m-p/1149787#M78582</guid>
      <dc:creator>René_S_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-18T18:08:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks for the feedback. In</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Simple-feature-request/m-p/1149788#M78583</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the feedback. In fact, those date-stamped config.xml files are named like that to avoid confusion with the config.xml file that is being generated. They only appear if you have a config.xml file in the root of the project folder when you run the export tool. I know that if you do not complete the process (e.g., start the export but do not save the ZIP) the export tool can leave a config.xml file behind, in the project folder. If you follow through and the process does not fail, you should not see these time-stamped config.xml files. This is just a very long way of saying that those time-stamped files are an artifact, not a feature, to insure we do not wipe out anything that you may already have in your project folder. We are not trying to manage those files.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 19:30:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Simple-feature-request/m-p/1149788#M78583</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaulF_IntelCorp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-18T19:30:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

