<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Vmware - Nvme - Intel - Storage in Software Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Vmware-Nvme-Intel-Storage/m-p/1156597#M78830</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Intel is going super fast in terms of technological breakthroughs, for example ( AVX-512,ISA-L ) etc. When will Vmware catch up on EVC compatibility, majority of the customers cannot go beyond "Nehelam". Same thing with hyper converged technologies don't know when then can catch up with Intel and start using ( AVX 512 and ISA-L , PHI) and come up with optimized products?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 15:36:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>suresh_p_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-07-28T15:36:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Vmware - Nvme - Intel - Storage</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Vmware-Nvme-Intel-Storage/m-p/1156597#M78830</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Intel is going super fast in terms of technological breakthroughs, for example ( AVX-512,ISA-L ) etc. When will Vmware catch up on EVC compatibility, majority of the customers cannot go beyond "Nehelam". Same thing with hyper converged technologies don't know when then can catch up with Intel and start using ( AVX 512 and ISA-L , PHI) and come up with optimized products?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 15:36:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Vmware-Nvme-Intel-Storage/m-p/1156597#M78830</guid>
      <dc:creator>suresh_p_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-28T15:36:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

