<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Interesting observation in Software Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Interesting-observation/m-p/885308#M9724</link>
    <description>In an attempt to discern the maximum throughput of my [100Mbps] local network, and to a lesser extent see what level of overhead is introduced by the operating system (Windows), I performed a crude test which simply involved pushing as much traffic onto the link as possible destined to the next hop (router)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Surprisingly, network utilization peaked at around 4MB/s (~33%); clearly very far from optimal.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Long story short, the problem turned out to be the interrupt rate of the network adapter which was [during the initial test] set at 'adaptive', after modifying this to the lowest possible setting network utilization was able to maintain a stable ~99%. Oddly enough, Intel's recommendation was for higher interrupt rates when in high-load situations ... this actually produced a negative effect rendering &amp;lt; 12% utilization.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:35:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>matt_j</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-13T09:35:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Interesting observation</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Interesting-observation/m-p/885308#M9724</link>
      <description>In an attempt to discern the maximum throughput of my [100Mbps] local network, and to a lesser extent see what level of overhead is introduced by the operating system (Windows), I performed a crude test which simply involved pushing as much traffic onto the link as possible destined to the next hop (router)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Surprisingly, network utilization peaked at around 4MB/s (~33%); clearly very far from optimal.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Long story short, the problem turned out to be the interrupt rate of the network adapter which was [during the initial test] set at 'adaptive', after modifying this to the lowest possible setting network utilization was able to maintain a stable ~99%. Oddly enough, Intel's recommendation was for higher interrupt rates when in high-load situations ... this actually produced a negative effect rendering &amp;lt; 12% utilization.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:35:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Software-Archive/Interesting-observation/m-p/885308#M9724</guid>
      <dc:creator>matt_j</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-13T09:35:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

