<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Question about ocall and syscall in Intel Confidential Computing</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Confidential-Computing/Question-about-ocall-and-syscall/m-p/1139687#M2217</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a basic question about syscall and ocall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I know, system call&amp;nbsp;is prohibited inside the enclave since the operating system is untrusted.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But the developers still can define (insecure) ocall interface, then anyhow system call can be used (indirectly).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is, what is the difference, in terms of security,&amp;nbsp;between (1) calling the system call directly inside the enclave and (2) calling ocall function that indirectly calls system call??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The both seems&amp;nbsp;equally insecure to me. What am I missing?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 05:05:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>park__minkyung</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-08-07T05:05:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Question about ocall and syscall</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Confidential-Computing/Question-about-ocall-and-syscall/m-p/1139687#M2217</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a basic question about syscall and ocall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I know, system call&amp;nbsp;is prohibited inside the enclave since the operating system is untrusted.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But the developers still can define (insecure) ocall interface, then anyhow system call can be used (indirectly).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is, what is the difference, in terms of security,&amp;nbsp;between (1) calling the system call directly inside the enclave and (2) calling ocall function that indirectly calls system call??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The both seems&amp;nbsp;equally insecure to me. What am I missing?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 05:05:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Confidential-Computing/Question-about-ocall-and-syscall/m-p/1139687#M2217</guid>
      <dc:creator>park__minkyung</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-07T05:05:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

