<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic About IntelSGX in Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX)</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Software-Guard-Extensions/About-IntelSGX/m-p/1168468#M3116</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;1. Can we strictly turn the Intel SGX on dynamically?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;2. Can we develop a SGX as third party service for application&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;3. Can we develop and take an advantage without Intel SGX sdk?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Kelvin,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 02:19:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kelvin_C_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-12-06T02:19:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>About IntelSGX</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Software-Guard-Extensions/About-IntelSGX/m-p/1168468#M3116</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;1. Can we strictly turn the Intel SGX on dynamically?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;2. Can we develop a SGX as third party service for application&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;3. Can we develop and take an advantage without Intel SGX sdk?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Kelvin,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 02:19:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Software-Guard-Extensions/About-IntelSGX/m-p/1168468#M3116</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kelvin_C_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-06T02:19:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Software-Guard-Extensions/About-IntelSGX/m-p/1168469#M3117</link>
      <description>Hi,

1. No. The PRM is allocated at boot time. Therefore, switching SGX on/off requires a reboot.
2. It is not clear to me what you mean by that. Can you clarify?
3. Yes. You will still need a driver in order to use SGX capabilities, but it is completely possible to use SGX without the SDK.

Regards,
Rodolfo</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 02:40:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Software-Guard-Extensions/About-IntelSGX/m-p/1168469#M3117</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rodolfo_S_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-06T02:40:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Rodolfo,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Software-Guard-Extensions/About-IntelSGX/m-p/1168470#M3118</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Rodolfo,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your answering.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;For the second question, sorry about it is quite confusing.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I try to clarify my ideas:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;I mean , can we isolated the protected target and Intel SGX module?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;For example, like online-gaming, we wanna to protect some memory address, it only can be read by game itself.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;But we are not able to re-compile the game, so that we may make a DLL and Driver (pair) as a security service to it.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em;"&gt;Is it a possible planning ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Kelvin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2017 03:15:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Software-Guard-Extensions/About-IntelSGX/m-p/1168470#M3118</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kelvin_C_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-06T03:15:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

