<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Re:There is no advisoryIDs in the Get TCB Info API's Response in Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX)</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Software-Guard-Extensions/There-is-no-advisoryIDs-in-the-Get-TCB-Info-API-s-Response/m-p/1401373#M5400</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;thanks!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="Y2IQFc"&gt;We look forward to your correction.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 01:01:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Toshi_O</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-07-19T01:01:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>There is no advisoryIDs in the Get TCB Info API's Response</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Software-Guard-Extensions/There-is-no-advisoryIDs-in-the-Get-TCB-Info-API-s-Response/m-p/1393723#M5338</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For example, when using Remote Attestation with DCAP for Quote verification, TCBInfo is obtained from the following URL.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://api.trustedservices.intel.com/sgx/certification/v3/tcb?fmspc=00906ed50000" target="_blank"&gt;https://api.trustedservices.intel.com/sgx/certification/v3/tcb?fmspc=00906ed50000&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The tcbStatus in the response returned by this API has a ConfirmationAndSWHardeningNeeded&lt;BR /&gt;status. But why is there no AdvisoryId associated with this Status in the response?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://api.portal.trustedservices.intel.com/documentation#pcs-tcb-info-v3" target="_blank"&gt;https://api.portal.trustedservices.intel.com/documentation#pcs-tcb-info-v3&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The advisoryId is present in this reference.&lt;BR /&gt;If there is a vulnerability related to tcbLevel, I would expect the advisoryId to be included in the API response, but is this understanding incorrect?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also, if the advisoryId is not currently included in the API response, what is the best way for a verifier to know the relationship between a particular TCBLevel and the advisoryId?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2022 02:49:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Software-Guard-Extensions/There-is-no-advisoryIDs-in-the-Get-TCB-Info-API-s-Response/m-p/1393723#M5338</guid>
      <dc:creator>Toshi_O</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-20T02:49:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: There is no advisoryIDs in the Get TCB Info API's Response</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Software-Guard-Extensions/There-is-no-advisoryIDs-in-the-Get-TCB-Info-API-s-Response/m-p/1398560#M5386</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Additional information.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Attestation Report issued by Intel's IAS when the EPID verification was performed on the same machine.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;{"id":"...","timestamp":"2022-07-07T08:29:08.930675","version":4,"advisoryURL":"https://security-center.intel.com","advisoryIDs":["INTEL-SA-00334"],"isvEnclaveQuoteStatus":"SW_HARDENING_NEEDED","isvEnclaveQuoteBody":"..."}

&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I think AdvisoryId is a common problem independent of either IAS or DCAP.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Then I am wondering why IAS returns AdvisoryId and Intel's PCS does not return AdvisoryId&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2022 08:45:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Software-Guard-Extensions/There-is-no-advisoryIDs-in-the-Get-TCB-Info-API-s-Response/m-p/1398560#M5386</guid>
      <dc:creator>Toshi_O</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-07T08:45:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: There is no advisoryIDs in the Get TCB Info API's Response</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Software-Guard-Extensions/There-is-no-advisoryIDs-in-the-Get-TCB-Info-API-s-Response/m-p/1400104#M5393</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Toshi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Apologies for not responding sooner. I am looking into this and will let you know when I have more information&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sincerely,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sahira&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2022 21:22:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Software-Guard-Extensions/There-is-no-advisoryIDs-in-the-Get-TCB-Info-API-s-Response/m-p/1400104#M5393</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sahira_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-13T21:22:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re:There is no advisoryIDs in the Get TCB Info API's Response</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Software-Guard-Extensions/There-is-no-advisoryIDs-in-the-Get-TCB-Info-API-s-Response/m-p/1400784#M5394</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your understanding is correct, and this feature will actually be released soon.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sincerely,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sahira &lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 21:33:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Software-Guard-Extensions/There-is-no-advisoryIDs-in-the-Get-TCB-Info-API-s-Response/m-p/1400784#M5394</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sahira_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-15T21:33:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Re:There is no advisoryIDs in the Get TCB Info API's Response</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Software-Guard-Extensions/There-is-no-advisoryIDs-in-the-Get-TCB-Info-API-s-Response/m-p/1401373#M5400</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;thanks!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="Y2IQFc"&gt;We look forward to your correction.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 01:01:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Software-Guard-Extensions/There-is-no-advisoryIDs-in-the-Get-TCB-Info-API-s-Response/m-p/1401373#M5400</guid>
      <dc:creator>Toshi_O</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-19T01:01:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

