<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Secure Transaction Processing in Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX)</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Software-Guard-Extensions/Secure-Transaction-Processing/m-p/1622908#M6187</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;I am designing a solution where it is mandatory for its components to use HSM appliance, to leverage its features for the key management and&amp;nbsp;Secure Transaction Processing to encrypt/decrypt the data/images being transmitted from our entity to another. I went through the SGX capabilities and found typically matches the requirements as a cost effect solution, yet still wondering for having it as an intermediate layer between the two applications' ends to secure the transaction processing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd rather request a direct answer for its usability in such case, while thankfully to be provided with the architecture particulars through Intel references.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in Advance,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 11:24:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Essam</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-08-13T11:24:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Secure Transaction Processing</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Software-Guard-Extensions/Secure-Transaction-Processing/m-p/1622908#M6187</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;I am designing a solution where it is mandatory for its components to use HSM appliance, to leverage its features for the key management and&amp;nbsp;Secure Transaction Processing to encrypt/decrypt the data/images being transmitted from our entity to another. I went through the SGX capabilities and found typically matches the requirements as a cost effect solution, yet still wondering for having it as an intermediate layer between the two applications' ends to secure the transaction processing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd rather request a direct answer for its usability in such case, while thankfully to be provided with the architecture particulars through Intel references.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in Advance,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 11:24:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Software-Guard-Extensions/Secure-Transaction-Processing/m-p/1622908#M6187</guid>
      <dc:creator>Essam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-13T11:24:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

